From: Ihor Solodrai Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 22:30:26 +0000 (-0800) Subject: bpf,docs: Document KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS flag X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=74bc4f6127207624ec06f0d0984b280a390992aa;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git bpf,docs: Document KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS flag Add a section explaining KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS kfunc flag. Remove __prog arg annotation, as it is no longer supported. Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260120223027.3981805-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst index 3eb59a8f9f340..75e6c078e0e72 100644 --- a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst +++ b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst @@ -232,23 +232,6 @@ Or:: ... } -2.3.6 __prog Annotation ---------------------------- -This annotation is used to indicate that the argument needs to be fixed up to -the bpf_prog_aux of the caller BPF program. Any value passed into this argument -is ignored, and rewritten by the verifier. - -An example is given below:: - - __bpf_kfunc int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq, - int (callback_fn)(void *map, int *key, void *value), - unsigned int flags, - void *aux__prog) - { - struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = aux__prog; - ... - } - .. _BPF_kfunc_nodef: 2.4 Using an existing kernel function @@ -381,6 +364,38 @@ encouraged to make their use-cases known as early as possible, and participate in upstream discussions regarding whether to keep, change, deprecate, or remove those kfuncs if and when such discussions occur. +2.5.9 KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS flag +------------------------------------ + +The KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS flag is used to indicate that the BPF signature +of the kfunc is different from it's kernel signature, and the values +for implicit arguments are provided at load time by the verifier. + +Only arguments of specific types are implicit. +Currently only ``struct bpf_prog_aux *`` type is supported. + +A kfunc with KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS flag therefore has two types in BTF: one +function matching the kernel declaration (with _impl suffix in the +name by convention), and another matching the intended BPF API. + +Verifier only allows calls to the non-_impl version of a kfunc, that +uses a signature without the implicit arguments. + +Example declaration: + +.. code-block:: c + + __bpf_kfunc int bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_task_work *tw, + void *map__map, bpf_task_work_callback_t callback, + struct bpf_prog_aux *aux) { ... } + +Example usage in BPF program: + +.. code-block:: c + + /* note that the last argument is omitted */ + bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, task_work_callback); + 2.6 Registering the kfuncs --------------------------