From: Patrick Palka Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 02:39:15 +0000 (-0400) Subject: c++: maybe_dependent_member_ref and typenames [PR118626] X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-16~322 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7a91400c142899ea0aeb8b62577496cf24c68156;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git c++: maybe_dependent_member_ref and typenames [PR118626] Here during maybe_dependent_member_ref for accepted_type<_Up>, we correctly don't strip the typedef because it's a complex one (its defaulted template parameter isn't used in its definition) and so we recurse to consider its corresponding TYPE_DECL. We then incorrectly decide to not rewrite this use because of the TYPENAME_TYPE shortcut. But I don't think this shortcut should apply to a typedef TYPE_DECL. PR c++/118626 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (maybe_dependent_member_ref): Restrict TYPENAME_TYPE shortcut to non-typedef TYPE_DECL. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-alias25a.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc index 23e41a0fdcb..95b89f1281b 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc @@ -17789,7 +17789,8 @@ maybe_dependent_member_ref (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, if (TREE_CODE (t) == TYPE_DECL) { - if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (t)) == TYPENAME_TYPE + if (!is_typedef_decl (t) + && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (t)) == TYPENAME_TYPE && TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (t)) == t) /* The TYPE_DECL for a typename has DECL_CONTEXT of the typename scope, but it doesn't need to be rewritten again. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-alias25a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-alias25a.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74ef1e4d890 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-alias25a.C @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// PR c++/118626 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +template struct _Nth_type { using type = _Nth_type; }; + +template +struct variant { + template static constexpr long __accepted_index = 0; + template using __to_type = typename _Nth_type<_Np>::type; + template using __accepted_type = __to_type<__accepted_index<_Tp>>; + template> variant(_Up); +}; + +template +struct Node { Node(_Tp); }; + +template using Tree = variant>; +using type = decltype(Tree{Node{42}}); +using type = Tree;