From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:30:58 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: arm: xfail gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c for thumb1
X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-14.3.0~420
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7fb1d7bff18d318de00021765e1e12b0d56e7ac1;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

arm: xfail gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c for thumb1

Partial backport of 2a502f9e4c5c6a8e908ef1b0b5c03fb2e4bd4390.

gcc/testsuite:
	* gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c: Expand check for any
	insn suggesting a zero-extend.  XFAIL for thumb1 code.

Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c
index 3b4ab048fb0..fa3d34400bf 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-1.c
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ unsigned char foo (unsigned char c)
 {
   return (c >= '0') && (c <= '9');
 }
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "uxtb" } } */
+/* We shouldn't need any zero-extension idioms here.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\t(uxtb|and|lsr|lsl)" { xfail arm_thumb1 } } } */