From: Nick Kew Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:42:50 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Veto, promote X-Git-Tag: 2.2.15~97 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8169f0da6a4d929ad2bae901ea3515f8d0f3bc76;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git Veto, promote git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@903514 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index b0b17060d94..f48e847c6ec 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -87,6 +87,16 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] + * http_request: We don't need to create new->allowed_methods both + on line 413 and again on line 450. + Patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=897570 + +1: niq, sf, wrowe + + * mod_authnz_ldap: log authn failures at INFO instead of WARN + Trunk Patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=902641&view=rev + 2.2.x Patch: trunk patch works + +1: covener, sf, fuankg + PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ] @@ -149,19 +159,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.2.x Patch: http://people.apache.org/~sf/mod_reqtimeout.2.2-v2.patch +1: sf - * http_request: We don't need to create new->allowed_methods both - on line 413 and again on line 450. - Patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=897570 - +1: niq, sf, wrowe - - * mod_authnz_ldap: log authn failures at INFO instead of WARN - Trunk Patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=902641&view=rev - 2.2.x Patch: trunk patch works - +1: covener, sf, fuankg - niq asks: Why not debug level, as with the previous case? Presumably - the main log message is the one from mod_auth_[basic|digest]? - Ping me back on IRC to convince me to +1 this. - * Ensure each subrequest has a shallow copy of headers_in so that the parent request headers are not corrupted. Elimiates a problematic optimization in the case of no request body. PR 48359 @@ -171,6 +168,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: Ported to 2.2; http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/protocol_headers_copy.patch +1: wrowe + -1: niq: this risks breaking existing apps, as discussed in + comments on PR 48359. PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED