From: Richard Biener Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:08:07 +0000 (+0100) Subject: middle-end/119119 - re-gimplification of empty CTOR assignments X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-12.5.0~33 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=81ebacc70c3446218a347902362cc032fc615f6c;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git middle-end/119119 - re-gimplification of empty CTOR assignments The following testcase runs into a re-gimplification issue during inlining when processing MEM[(struct e *)this_2(D)].a = {}; where re-gimplification does not handle assignments in the same way than the gimplifier but instead relies on rhs_predicate_for and gimplifying the RHS standalone. This fails to handle special-casing of CTORs. The is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call predicate already handles clobbers but not empty CTORs so we end up in the fallback code trying to force the CTOR into a separate stmt using a temporary - but as we have a non-copyable type here that ICEs. The following generalizes empty CTORs in is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call since those need no additional re-gimplification. PR middle-end/119119 * gimplify.cc (is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call): All empty CTORs are OK when not a register type. * g++.dg/torture/pr11911.C: New testcase. (cherry picked from commit 3bd61c1dfaa2d7153eb4be82f423533ea937d0f9) --- diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc index a7b5a388337..ecbe58d2b05 100644 --- a/gcc/gimplify.cc +++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call (tree t) else return (is_gimple_val (t) || is_gimple_lvalue (t) - || TREE_CLOBBER_P (t) + || (TREE_CODE (t) == CONSTRUCTOR && CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (t) == 0) || TREE_CODE (t) == CALL_EXPR); } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr11911.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr11911.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7dc836ff9b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr11911.C @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-require-effective-target c++17 } + +struct b { + int a; +}; +struct c { + b d{}; + c() = default; + c(c &) = delete; +}; +struct e { + c a{}; + e() {} +}; +inline e f() { return {}; } +struct g { + e cx; + g() : cx{f()} {} +}; +void h() { g i; }