From: Paul Eggert Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:53:18 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler): Mention that AC_PROG_CC_C99 also X-Git-Tag: v2.62~342 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=83c9a63e19a0bff67ad229905f436a557152223a;p=thirdparty%2Fautoconf.git * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler): Mention that AC_PROG_CC_C99 also checks for unsigned long long int. --- diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 29c6c002..d360068d 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2007-03-23 Paul Eggert + + * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler): Mention that AC_PROG_CC_C99 also + checks for unsigned long long int. + 2007-03-19 Paul Eggert * doc/autoconf.texi (Limitations of Usual Tools): Warn about other diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi index 817ab5c4..6fa70364 100644 --- a/doc/autoconf.texi +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi @@ -6438,8 +6438,9 @@ If the C compiler is not in C99 mode by default, try to add an option to output variable @code{CC} to make it so. This macro tries various options that select C99 on some system or another. It considers the compiler to be in C99 mode if it handles @code{_Bool}, -@code{//} comments, flexible array members, @code{inline}, @code{long -long int}, mixed code and declarations, named initialization of structs, +@code{//} comments, flexible array members, @code{inline}, signed and +unsigned @code{long long int}, mixed code and declarations, named +initialization of structs, @code{restrict}, @code{va_copy}, varargs macros, variable declarations in @code{for} loops, and variable length arrays.