From: Alex Coplan Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:08:31 +0000 (+0100) Subject: doc: Fixes to RTL-SSA sample code X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-15~6853 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=84a5be47f8e13839efdf0e06f02ef1a0cacf5e34;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git doc: Fixes to RTL-SSA sample code This patch fixes up the code examples in the RTL-SSA documentation (the sections on making insn changes) to reflect the current API. The main issues are as follows: - rtl_ssa::recog takes an obstack_watermark & as the first parameter. Presumably this is intended to be the change attempt, so I've updated the examples to pass this through. - The variants of recog and restrict_movement that take an ignore predicate have been renamed with an _ignoring suffix, so I've updated callers to use those names. - A couple of minor "obvious" fixes to add a missing address-of operator and correct a variable name. gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/rtl.texi: Fix up sample code for RTL-SSA insn changes. --- diff --git a/gcc/doc/rtl.texi b/gcc/doc/rtl.texi index 76aeafb8f155..0ed88f58821e 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/rtl.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/rtl.texi @@ -4964,7 +4964,7 @@ the pass should check whether the new pattern matches a target instruction or satisfies the requirements of an inline asm: @smallexample -if (!rtl_ssa::recog (change)) +if (!rtl_ssa::recog (attempt, change)) return false; @end smallexample @@ -5015,7 +5015,7 @@ if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement (change)) insn_change_watermark watermark; // Use validate_change etc. to change INSN's pattern. @dots{} -if (!rtl_ssa::recog (change) +if (!rtl_ssa::recog (attempt, change) || !rtl_ssa::change_is_worthwhile (change)) return false; @@ -5048,7 +5048,7 @@ For example, if a pass is changing exactly two instructions, it might do: @smallexample -rtl_ssa::insn_change *changes[] = @{ &change1, change2 @}; +rtl_ssa::insn_change *changes[] = @{ &change1, &change2 @}; @end smallexample where @code{change1}'s instruction must come before @code{change2}'s. @@ -5066,7 +5066,7 @@ in the correct order with respect to each other. The way to do this is: @smallexample -if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement (change, insn_is_changing (changes))) +if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement_ignoring (change, insn_is_changing (changes))) return false; @end smallexample @@ -5078,7 +5078,7 @@ changing instructions (which might, for example, no longer need to clobber the flags register). The way to do this is: @smallexample -if (!rtl_ssa::recog (change, insn_is_changing (changes))) +if (!rtl_ssa::recog_ignoring (attempt, change, insn_is_changing (changes))) return false; @end smallexample @@ -5118,28 +5118,28 @@ Putting all this together, the process for a two-instruction change is: @smallexample auto attempt = crtl->ssa->new_change_attempt (); -rtl_ssa::insn_change change (insn1); +rtl_ssa::insn_change change1 (insn1); change1.new_defs = @dots{}; change1.new_uses = @dots{}; change1.move_range = @dots{}; -rtl_ssa::insn_change change (insn2); +rtl_ssa::insn_change change2 (insn2); change2.new_defs = @dots{}; change2.new_uses = @dots{}; change2.move_range = @dots{}; -rtl_ssa::insn_change *changes[] = @{ &change1, change2 @}; +rtl_ssa::insn_change *changes[] = @{ &change1, &change2 @}; auto is_changing = insn_is_changing (changes); -if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement (change1, is_changing) - || !rtl_ssa::restrict_movement (change2, is_changing)) +if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement_ignoring (change1, is_changing) + || !rtl_ssa::restrict_movement_ignoring (change2, is_changing)) return false; insn_change_watermark watermark; // Use validate_change etc. to change INSN1's and INSN2's patterns. @dots{} -if (!rtl_ssa::recog (change1, is_changing) - || !rtl_ssa::recog (change2, is_changing) +if (!rtl_ssa::recog_ignoring (attempt, change1, is_changing) + || !rtl_ssa::recog_ignoring (attempt, change2, is_changing) || !rtl_ssa::changes_are_worthwhile (changes) || !crtl->ssa->verify_insn_changes (changes)) return false;