From: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 22:52:06 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Revert "mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr" X-Git-Tag: v5.15.203~27 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=902988b0eee1c849125199f29ab5a2022401c2af;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git Revert "mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr" [ Upstream commit 8e2760eaab778494fc1fa257031e0e1799647f46 ] This commit was originally adding the ability to add MPTCP endpoints with ID 0 by accident. The in-kernel PM, handling MPTCP endpoints at the net namespace level, is not supposed to handle endpoints with such ID, because this ID 0 is reserved to the initial subflow, as mentioned in the MPTCPv1 protocol [1], a per-connection setting. Note that 'ip mptcp endpoint add id 0' stops early with an error, but other tools might still request the in-kernel PM to create MPTCP endpoints with this restricted ID 0. In other words, it was wrong to call the mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id helper to check whether the address ID attribute is set: if it was set to 0, a new MPTCP endpoint would be created with ID 0, which is not expected, and might cause various issues later. Fixes: 584f38942626 ("mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8684#section-3.2-9 [1] Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260407-net-mptcp-revert-pm-needs-id-v2-1-7a25cbc324f8@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski [ adapted changes from pm_kernel.c to pm_netlink.c ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 634fe0360c496..6fb14148a96e0 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -972,8 +972,7 @@ static bool address_use_port(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry) } static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, - struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry, - bool needs_id) + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry) { struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *cur; unsigned int addr_max; @@ -1000,7 +999,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, goto out; } - if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) { + if (!entry->addr.id) { find_next: entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap, MAX_ADDR_ID + 1, @@ -1011,7 +1010,7 @@ find_next: } } - if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) + if (!entry->addr.id) goto out; __set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap); @@ -1152,7 +1151,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock_common *skc) entry->ifindex = 0; entry->flags = 0; entry->lsk = NULL; - ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true); + ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry); if (ret < 0) kfree(entry); @@ -1374,18 +1373,6 @@ next: return 0; } -static bool mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(const struct nlattr *attr, - struct genl_info *info) -{ - struct nlattr *tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1]; - - if (!nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX, attr, - mptcp_pm_addr_policy, info->extack) && - tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID]) - return true; - return false; -} - static int mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR]; @@ -1412,8 +1399,7 @@ static int mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) return ret; } } - ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, - !mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(attr, info)); + ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry); if (ret < 0) { GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "too many addresses or duplicate one"); if (entry->lsk)