From: Nick Kew Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:42:42 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Address several points people have made in STATUS X-Git-Tag: 2.2.7~304 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=91435da0fe868a2220d7532d353dd19f67a03377;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git Address several points people have made in STATUS (including proposal updates) git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@584845 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index d1f46a8a0f9..9c6891717ba 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -183,11 +183,13 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: PR 13986 and PR 16139 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=579991 (code) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580502 (docs) + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=584842 (docs) +1: niq, rpluem rpluem says: IMHO the DefaultType documentation is now somewhat confusing (e.g. the server must add, but sometimes is better not to) and should be rewritten. jim says: Is rpluem's concern addressed? + niq says: Yes, when we add r584842 to the proposal. * mpm_winnt: Fix null pointer dereference PR 42572 @@ -196,15 +198,19 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: * mod_proxy_http: Don't mangle proxied URLs PR 42592 - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=583002 + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c?r1=582655&r2=583803&pathrev=583803 +1: niq -1: jim: As per Roy, (forward) proxies should not check the URI. See r583466 and r583803. + niq: updated proposal to address Roy & Jim's points. * core: backport ap_send_interim_response API http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582630 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582652 +1: niq + niq says: It has been suggested the function should move to http_filters. + I'm OK with that if others feel happier that way. The function + declaration presumably remains in http_protocol.h, so no API change. * mod_proxy_http: Correctly forward unexpected interim (HTTP 1xx) responses PR 16518 @@ -212,6 +218,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: +1: niq rpluem says: There is a conflict with the documentation (I don't know why). Once fixed I am +1. + niq says: Do you mean my addition to the documentation included + in r582631, or is there something else that needs reconciling? PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED