From: Greg Ames Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:22:51 +0000 (+0000) Subject: re-insert a backport vote X-Git-Tag: 2.0.55~218 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9415ffeae025b529335a03a358e4710dadff6803;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git re-insert a backport vote git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x@168616 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 54899647a1a..81d7269059f 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -372,6 +372,26 @@ PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: * ThreadStackSize for Win32 and threaded MPMs trawick will eventually put together a patch for httpd 2.0.next +1 concept: trawick, nd, stoddard, wrowe + + * don't propagate input headers describing a body to a GET subrequest + with no body + http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158798 + http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=159410 + http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=160573 + +1: gregames + -1: jerenkrantz (read_length isn't a sufficient check to see if a body + is present in the request; presence of T-E and C-L in + the headers is the correct flag.) + gregames: done in rev 160573 + ±0: wrowe (this has a negative impact on modules who wish to 'inspect' + the headers, e.g. an xml transformation affected by the query + string or request POST args. The right solution is adopt apreq, + providing an API for filters to participate in POST bodies.) + gregames: this does not affect POSTs. the affected function helps + create a GET subrequest with no body and is unprepared to deal with + subrequest bodies. any modules or applications wishing to + inspect headers will in fact work better because the headers will + reflect reality. CURRENT VOTES: