From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:43:16 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: testsuite: XFAIL two insv_1.c tests [PR87763]
X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-12~169
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9a54db29387c4e936ab99499bf4d3e1649e92800;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

testsuite: XFAIL two insv_1.c tests [PR87763]

This patch XFAILs the remaining regressions in PR87763.  We should
still fix them at some point, but that's not GCC 11 material.

gcc/testsuite/
	PR target/87763
	* gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c: XFAIL two scan tests.
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c
index 9efa22e649d6..a1d26b0136b7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ typedef struct bitfield
 bitfield
 bfi1 (bitfield a)
 {
-  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 0, 8" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 0, 8" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
   a.eight = 3;
   return a;
 }
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ bfi1 (bitfield a)
 bitfield
 bfi2 (bitfield a)
 {
-  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 16, 5" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 16, 5" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
   a.five = 7;
   return a;
 }