From: William A. Rowe Jr <wrowe@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:37:29 +0000 (+0000)
Subject:   Looks like noone plans to leverage our sdbm
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a184139093fe441c09f04cdcdf879e5561478030;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

  Looks like noone plans to leverage our sdbm


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@95113 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 10d8a007bc1..a101bf984af 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 1.3 STATUS:						-*-text-*-
-  Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/15 14:36:06 $]
+  Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/15 14:37:29 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -162,10 +162,6 @@ Open issues:
         necessarily the library that Apache was built with.  Aught to
         rewrite dbmmanage with the proper library for clean administration.
 
-    * SDBM is now distributed in src/lib, as distributed with perl, but
-      is only incorporated into the Win32 build.  Extra cleanup and build 
-      mechanics are still needed for other platforms.
-
     * Release builds: Should we provide Configuration or not?
       Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support?
 	+1: Brian, Jim, Dirkx, Ken +1 (possible suexec path issue, though)