From: Martin Panter Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:18:45 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Issue #28820: Fix spelling of “practice” as a noun X-Git-Tag: v2.7.13rc1~20 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a52b567a3f36004cc48f91feeb708548c20e57d5;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git Issue #28820: Fix spelling of “practice” as a noun --- diff --git a/Doc/howto/urllib2.rst b/Doc/howto/urllib2.rst index c5003809829e..f6cba755443b 100644 --- a/Doc/howto/urllib2.rst +++ b/Doc/howto/urllib2.rst @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ This document was reviewed and revised by John Lee. .. [#] For an introduction to the CGI protocol see `Writing Web Applications in Python `_. .. [#] Google for example. -.. [#] Browser sniffing is a very bad practise for website design - building +.. [#] Browser sniffing is a very bad practice for website design - building sites using web standards is much more sensible. Unfortunately a lot of sites still send different versions to different browsers. .. [#] The user agent for MSIE 6 is diff --git a/Doc/tutorial/modules.rst b/Doc/tutorial/modules.rst index 0ef07a3c786a..6fb4ffda2b84 100644 --- a/Doc/tutorial/modules.rst +++ b/Doc/tutorial/modules.rst @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ when the ``from...import`` statement is executed. (This also works when ``__all__`` is defined.) Although certain modules are designed to export only names that follow certain -patterns when you use ``import *``, it is still considered bad practise in +patterns when you use ``import *``, it is still considered bad practice in production code. Remember, there is nothing wrong with using ``from Package import diff --git a/Mac/Modules/cg/CFMLateImport.c b/Mac/Modules/cg/CFMLateImport.c index 955acfb85bd7..4da153613f26 100644 --- a/Mac/Modules/cg/CFMLateImport.c +++ b/Mac/Modules/cg/CFMLateImport.c @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static OSStatus RunRelocationEngine(const FragToFixInfo *fragToFix, MoreAssertQ(fragToFix->sectionHeaders != nil); MoreAssertQ(fragToFix->loaderSection != nil); MoreAssertQ(fragToFix->section0Base != nil); // Technically, having a nil for these two is not a problem, ... - MoreAssertQ(fragToFix->section1Base != nil); // but in practise it a wildly deviant case and we should know about it. + MoreAssertQ(fragToFix->section1Base != nil); // but in practice it a wildly deviant case and we should know about it. MoreAssertQ(importLibrary != nil); MoreAssertQ(lookup != nil);