From: Guenter Roeck Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 11:06:39 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a5eefd0726b16b04eebabb17619a08f2703d13f9;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests The drm_test_rect_calc_hscale and drm_test_rect_calc_vscale unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by providing bad parameters to the tested functions. What is tested is the return value, not the existence of a warning backtrace. Suppress the backtraces to avoid clogging the kernel log and distraction from real problems. Additionally, the suppression API allows to actually ensure a warning was triggered, without parsing any kernel logs and keeping them clean. The suppression check requires CONFIG_BUG enabled. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260514-kunit_add_support-v11-3-b36a530a6d8f@redhat.com Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Acked-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: MaĆ­ra Canal Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati Acked-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c index 17e1f34b76101..3402f993d7d33 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -407,10 +408,27 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_rect_scale, drm_rect_scale_cases, drm_rect_scale_case_desc static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test) { const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value; - int scaling_factor; + int expected_warnings = params->expected_scaling_factor == -EINVAL; + int scaling_factor = INT_MIN; - scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_hscale(¶ms->src, ¶ms->dst, - params->min_range, params->max_range); + /* + * Without CONFIG_BUG, WARN_ON() is a no-op and the suppressed warning + * count stays zero, failing the assertion. + */ + if (expected_warnings && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + + /* + * drm_rect_calc_hscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad + * parameters are passed to it. This affects unit tests with -EINVAL + * error code in expected_scaling_factor. + */ + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_hscale(¶ms->src, ¶ms->dst, + params->min_range, + params->max_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, expected_warnings); + } KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor); } @@ -418,10 +436,26 @@ static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test) static void drm_test_rect_calc_vscale(struct kunit *test) { const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value; - int scaling_factor; + int expected_warnings = params->expected_scaling_factor == -EINVAL; + int scaling_factor = INT_MIN; - scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_vscale(¶ms->src, ¶ms->dst, - params->min_range, params->max_range); + /* + * Without CONFIG_BUG, WARN_ON() is a no-op and the suppressed warning + * count stays zero, failing the assertion. + */ + if (expected_warnings && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + + /* + * drm_rect_calc_vscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad + * parameters are passed to it. This affects unit tests with -EINVAL + * error code in expected_scaling_factor. + */ + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_vscale(¶ms->src, ¶ms->dst, + params->min_range, params->max_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, expected_warnings); + } KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor); }