From: Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:53:36 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Update.
X-Git-Tag: svn/VALGRIND_3_8_0~328
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a716c0f5c4fe3e8df7bddf9f204201e2bca5b1bb;p=thirdparty%2Fvalgrind.git

Update.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@12540
---

diff --git a/docs/internals/t-chaining-notes.txt b/docs/internals/t-chaining-notes.txt
index 5ed7cbaf75..3f32219210 100644
--- a/docs/internals/t-chaining-notes.txt
+++ b/docs/internals/t-chaining-notes.txt
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ check that all targets can run their insn set tests with
 --vex-guest-max-insns=1.
 
 all targets: run some tests using --profile-flags=... to exercise  
-function patchProfInc_<arch>
+function patchProfInc_<arch> [DONE: amd64 x86 ppc32 ppc64 arm s390??]
 
 figure out if there is a way to write a test program that checks
 that event checks are actually getting triggered
@@ -28,10 +28,6 @@ host_ppc_defs.h: is RdWrLR still needed?  If not delete.
 
 ditto ARM, Ld8S
 
-all backends: iselStmt(Ist_Exit) vs iselNext: make sure that the same
-JKs are handled, else it's not safe against branch sense switching
-[DONE: s390]
-
 Comments that used to be in m_scheduler.c:
    tchaining tests:
    - extensive spinrounds