From: Andrew Boardman <amb@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:47:10 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Note namespace issues
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=abae6d7b8dd5da71b66328222e5e9ba2ff3ee5c7;p=thirdparty%2Fkrb5.git

Note namespace issues

git-svn-id: svn://anonsvn.mit.edu/krb5/users/amb/referrals@18429 dc483132-0cff-0310-8789-dd5450dbe970
---

diff --git a/implementation.notes b/implementation.notes
index d9987dafd1..44d0791253 100644
--- a/implementation.notes
+++ b/implementation.notes
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+problems
+========
+- draft spec and RFC are divergent enough that MS machines not usable for
+  testing
+
 realm referrals, client side implementation:
 ===========================================
 - new realm selection priority is:
@@ -110,3 +115,10 @@ hostname canonicalization, client side
   hostnames as far as fully qualifying them in the client name resolution
   environment and following CNAME records
   [this seems desirable but could be technically problematic]
+
+namespace issues
+================
+- defined separate KDC option bit for RFC-style canonicalization since
+  the microsoft implementation is so different
+  - should key usage and padata types be different as well?
+- keyusage defined in draft (26) collides with KRB5_KEYUSAGE_PA_SAM_CHALLENGE_TRACKID