From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:25:03 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: crypto/mem.c: on Windows, use rand() instead of random()
X-Git-Tag: OpenSSL_1_1_1-pre1~1185
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=afe9bba749b9fd897b7e7d416d904852d867d2c2;p=thirdparty%2Fopenssl.git

crypto/mem.c: on Windows, use rand() instead of random()

Windows doesn't provide random().  In this particular case, our
requirements on the quality of randomness isn't high, so we don't
need to care how good randomness rand() does or doesn't provide.

Fixes #3778

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3779)
---

diff --git a/crypto/mem.c b/crypto/mem.c
index 0584814f732..aa5ac56b472 100644
--- a/crypto/mem.c
+++ b/crypto/mem.c
@@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ static void parseit(void)
         md_failstring = semi;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Windows doesn't have random(), but it has rand()
+ * Some rand() implementations aren't good, but we're not
+ * dealing with secure randomness here.
+ */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+# define random() rand()
+#endif
 /*
  * See if the current malloc should fail.
  */