From: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:30:14 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420]
X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-15~4918
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=beb1e2bf1bd4b7c8fc8d3dd450667344ae8e0aca;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420]

	PR target/112420

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c: Fix check for RVV.
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
index 3e5b986183c0..189a65534f61 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
@@ -49,4 +49,6 @@ int main ()
    sub-optimal and causes memory explosion (even though the cost model
    should reject that in the end).  */
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" { target {! riscv*-*-* } } } } */
+/* We end up using gathers for the strided load on RISC-V which would be OK.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "using gather/scatter for strided/grouped access" "vect" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } } */