From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 01:01:08 +0000 (+0200) Subject: CRIS: Don't apply PATTERN to insn before validation (PR 110144) X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-15~7966 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c15905da939fd5cf6ccc3f19f3ab273525f34f98;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git CRIS: Don't apply PATTERN to insn before validation (PR 110144) Oops. The validation was there, but PATTERN was applied before that. Noticeable only with rtl-checking (for example as in the report: "--enable-checking=yes,rtl") as this statement was only a (one of many) straggling olde-C declare-and-initialize-at-beginning-of-block thing. PR target/110144 * config/cris/cris.cc (cris_postdbr_cmpelim): Don't apply PATTERN to insn before validating it. --- diff --git a/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc b/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc index 7fca2af085a7..f04f501326e7 100644 --- a/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc +++ b/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc @@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ cris_postdbr_cmpelim () for (insn = get_insns (); insn; insn = next) { rtx_insn *outer_insn = insn; - rtx pat = PATTERN (insn); next = NEXT_INSN (outer_insn); @@ -389,6 +388,7 @@ cris_postdbr_cmpelim () if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn)) continue; + rtx pat = PATTERN (insn); /* Consider filled delay slots; there might be a comparison there. It's only the second insn in a sequence that is interesting. */