From: Ruediger Pluem Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:57:36 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * Comment X-Git-Tag: 2.2.17~51 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c57e73e41866f992a76e6f55855cc99f8836ad34;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git * Comment git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@992021 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 32bc45ef213..dce78386f5d 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: niq asks: I can see the logic of not cacheing partial responses, but why should mod_disk_cache worry about them if mod_cache allows them, as in the following proposal? + rpluem says: As poirier correctly mentions, the same must be done for mod_mem_cache + as well. *) mod_cache: Explicitly allow cache implementations to cache a 206 Partial Response if they so choose to do so. Previously an attempt to cache a 206 @@ -173,6 +175,10 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952823&view=rev 2.2.x Patch: http://people.apache.org/~minfrin/httpd-cache-partial2-2.2.patch +1: minfrin + -1: rpluem: Until the patch proposal above for mod_disk_cache is backported + and a similar patch for mod_mem_cache is proposed (no backport + possible since mod_mem_cache is no longer in trunk) and + committed. * config: fix/optimize SSL connections for IE6 browsers PR 49484