From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 19:19:11 +0000 (-0800) Subject: Revert "x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo" X-Git-Tag: v4.13.13~8 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c6625084fad0775659b2ed9a93e91bde4a9d8f50;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git Revert "x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo" commit ea0ee33988778fb73e4f45e7c73fb735787e2f32 upstream. This reverts commit 941f5f0f6ef5338814145cf2b813cf1f98873e2f. Sadly, it turns out that we really can't just do the cross-CPU IPI to all CPU's to get their proper frequencies, because it's much too expensive on systems with lots of cores. So we'll have to revert this for now, and revisit it using a smarter model (probably doing one system-wide IPI at open time, and doing all the frequency calculations in parallel). Reported-by: WANG Chao Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rafael J Wysocki Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile index 836877e2da222..cdf82492b7700 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ obj-y += common.o obj-y += rdrand.o obj-y += match.o obj-y += bugs.o -obj-y += aperfmperf.o +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += aperfmperf.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES) += capflags.o powerflags.o diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c index 957813e0180d2..0ee83321a3136 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time); unsigned long flags; + /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ + if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) + return; + local_irq_save(flags); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf); @@ -70,7 +74,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) { - s64 time_delta; unsigned int khz; if (!cpu_khz) @@ -79,12 +82,6 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) return 0; - /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ - time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu)); - khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); - if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) - return khz; - smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1); khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); if (khz) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c index 510e695962788..6df621ae62a7c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c @@ -77,10 +77,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode); if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) { - unsigned int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu); + unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu); - if (!freq) - freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu); if (!freq) freq = cpu_khz; seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",