From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 17:38:41 +0000 (+0200) Subject: openmp: Add testcase for scan directive with nested functions X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-13~7066 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cb4b99be48af1c0911ce2a957af20d9cd946f364;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git openmp: Add testcase for scan directive with nested functions > In convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, the following clauses are > missing: OMP_CLAUSE_AFFINITY, OMP_CLAUSE_DEVICE_TYPE, > OMP_CLAUSE_EXCLUSIVE, OMP_CLAUSE_INCLUSIVE. OMP_CLAUSE_{EXCLUSIVE,INCLUSIVE} isn't needed, because we don't walk the clauses at all for GIMPLE_OMP_SCAN. It would be a bug if we used the exclusive/inclusive operands after gimplification, but we apparently don't do that, all we check is whether the OMP_CLAUSE_KIND of the first clause (all should be the same) is OMP_CLAUSE_EXCLUSIVE or OMP_CLAUSE_INCLUSIVE, nothing else. That said, I think we should have a testcase. 2021-06-06 Jakub Jelinek * gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..807071d9156c --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +int baz (void); +void qux (int); +int r; + +int +foo (void) +{ + int r = 0, i; + void bar (void) { r++; } + #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r) + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) + { + r += baz (); + #pragma omp scan inclusive(r) + qux (r); + } + #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r) + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) + { + qux (r); + #pragma omp scan exclusive(r) + r += baz (); + } + bar (); + return r; +} + +int +corge (void) +{ + int r = 0, i; + void bar (void) + { + #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r) + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) + { + r += baz (); + #pragma omp scan inclusive(r) + qux (r); + } + #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r) + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) + { + qux (r); + #pragma omp scan exclusive(r) + r += baz (); + } + } + bar (); + return r; +}