From: Archana Polampalli Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:34:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: ghostscript: fix CVE-2023-36664 X-Git-Tag: 2022-04.12-kirkstone~47 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cd3921215cb782ecc9aeda5bb3b76863911bcb61;p=thirdparty%2Fopenembedded%2Fopenembedded-core.git ghostscript: fix CVE-2023-36664 Artifex Ghostscript through 10.01.2 mishandles permission validation for pipe devices (with the %pipe% prefix or the | pipe character prefix). Reference: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36664 Upstream patches: https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5e65eeae225c7d02d447de5abaf4a8e6d234fcea https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb342fdb60391073a69147cb71af1ac416a81099 Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman --- diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/CVE-2023-36664-0001.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/CVE-2023-36664-0001.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..99fcc61b9b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/CVE-2023-36664-0001.patch @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +From ed607fedbcd41f4a0e71df6af4ba5b07dd630209 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Chris Liddell +Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 10:23:06 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Bug 706761: Don't "reduce" %pipe% file names for + permission validation + +For regular file names, we try to simplfy relative paths before we use them. + +Because the %pipe% device can, effectively, accept command line calls, we +shouldn't be simplifying that string, because the command line syntax can end +up confusing the path simplifying code. That can result in permitting a pipe +command which does not match what was originally permitted. + +Special case "%pipe" in the validation code so we always deal with the entire +string. + +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5e65eeae225c7d02d447de5abaf4a8e6d234fcea] +CVE: CVE-2023-36664 + +Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli +--- + base/gpmisc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++-------- + base/gslibctx.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- + 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/base/gpmisc.c b/base/gpmisc.c +index 8b6458a..c61ab3f 100644 +--- a/base/gpmisc.c ++++ b/base/gpmisc.c +@@ -1076,16 +1076,29 @@ gp_validate_path_len(const gs_memory_t *mem, + && !memcmp(path + cdirstrl, dirsepstr, dirsepstrl)) { + prefix_len = 0; + } +- rlen = len+1; +- bufferfull = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(mem->thread_safe_memory, rlen + prefix_len, "gp_validate_path"); +- if (bufferfull == NULL) +- return gs_error_VMerror; +- +- buffer = bufferfull + prefix_len; +- if (gp_file_name_reduce(path, (uint)len, buffer, &rlen) != gp_combine_success) +- return gs_error_invalidfileaccess; +- buffer[rlen] = 0; + ++ /* "%pipe%" do not follow the normal rules for path definitions, so we ++ don't "reduce" them to avoid unexpected results ++ */ ++ if (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) != 0) { ++ bufferfull = buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(mem->thread_safe_memory, len + 1, "gp_validate_path"); ++ if (buffer == NULL) ++ return gs_error_VMerror; ++ memcpy(buffer, path, len); ++ buffer[len] = 0; ++ rlen = len; ++ } ++ else { ++ rlen = len+1; ++ bufferfull = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(mem->thread_safe_memory, rlen + prefix_len, "gp_validate_path"); ++ if (bufferfull == NULL) ++ return gs_error_VMerror; ++ ++ buffer = bufferfull + prefix_len; ++ if (gp_file_name_reduce(path, (uint)len, buffer, &rlen) != gp_combine_success) ++ return gs_error_invalidfileaccess; ++ buffer[rlen] = 0; ++ } + while (1) { + switch (mode[0]) + { +diff --git a/base/gslibctx.c b/base/gslibctx.c +index 5bf497b..5fdfe25 100644 +--- a/base/gslibctx.c ++++ b/base/gslibctx.c +@@ -734,14 +734,28 @@ gs_add_control_path_len_flags(const gs_memory_t *mem, gs_path_control_t type, co + return gs_error_rangecheck; + } + +- rlen = len+1; +- buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, rlen, "gp_validate_path"); +- if (buffer == NULL) +- return gs_error_VMerror; ++ /* "%pipe%" do not follow the normal rules for path definitions, so we ++ don't "reduce" them to avoid unexpected results ++ */ ++ if (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) != 0) { ++ buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, len + 1, "gs_add_control_path_len"); ++ if (buffer == NULL) ++ return gs_error_VMerror; ++ memcpy(buffer, path, len); ++ buffer[len] = 0; ++ rlen = len; ++ } ++ else { ++ rlen = len + 1; + +- if (gp_file_name_reduce(path, (uint)len, buffer, &rlen) != gp_combine_success) +- return gs_error_invalidfileaccess; +- buffer[rlen] = 0; ++ buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, rlen, "gs_add_control_path_len"); ++ if (buffer == NULL) ++ return gs_error_VMerror; ++ ++ if (gp_file_name_reduce(path, (uint)len, buffer, &rlen) != gp_combine_success) ++ return gs_error_invalidfileaccess; ++ buffer[rlen] = 0; ++ } + + n = control->num; + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) +@@ -827,14 +841,28 @@ gs_remove_control_path_len_flags(const gs_memory_t *mem, gs_path_control_t type, + return gs_error_rangecheck; + } + +- rlen = len+1; +- buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, rlen, "gp_validate_path"); +- if (buffer == NULL) +- return gs_error_VMerror; ++ /* "%pipe%" do not follow the normal rules for path definitions, so we ++ don't "reduce" them to avoid unexpected results ++ */ ++ if (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) != 0) { ++ buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, len + 1, "gs_remove_control_path_len"); ++ if (buffer == NULL) ++ return gs_error_VMerror; ++ memcpy(buffer, path, len); ++ buffer[len] = 0; ++ rlen = len; ++ } ++ else { ++ rlen = len+1; + +- if (gp_file_name_reduce(path, (uint)len, buffer, &rlen) != gp_combine_success) +- return gs_error_invalidfileaccess; +- buffer[rlen] = 0; ++ buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, rlen, "gs_remove_control_path_len"); ++ if (buffer == NULL) ++ return gs_error_VMerror; ++ ++ if (gp_file_name_reduce(path, (uint)len, buffer, &rlen) != gp_combine_success) ++ return gs_error_invalidfileaccess; ++ buffer[rlen] = 0; ++ } + + n = control->num; + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { +-- +2.40.1 diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/CVE-2023-36664-0002.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/CVE-2023-36664-0002.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7d78e6b1b19 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript/CVE-2023-36664-0002.patch @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +From f96350aeb7f8c2e3f7129866c694a24f241db18c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Chris Liddell +Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:08:12 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Bug 706778: 706761 revisit + +Two problems with the original commit. The first a silly typo inverting the +logic of a test. + +The second was forgetting that we actually actually validate two candidate +strings for pipe devices. One with the expected "%pipe%" prefix, the other +using the pipe character prefix: "|". + +This addresses both those. + +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb342fdb60391073a69147cb71af1ac416a81099] +CVE: CVE-2023-36664 + +Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli +--- + base/gpmisc.c | 2 +- + base/gslibctx.c | 4 ++-- + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/base/gpmisc.c b/base/gpmisc.c +index c61ab3f..e459f6a 100644 +--- a/base/gpmisc.c ++++ b/base/gpmisc.c +@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ gp_validate_path_len(const gs_memory_t *mem, + /* "%pipe%" do not follow the normal rules for path definitions, so we + don't "reduce" them to avoid unexpected results + */ +- if (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) != 0) { ++ if (path[0] == '|' || (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) == 0)) { + bufferfull = buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(mem->thread_safe_memory, len + 1, "gp_validate_path"); + if (buffer == NULL) + return gs_error_VMerror; +diff --git a/base/gslibctx.c b/base/gslibctx.c +index 5fdfe25..2a1addf 100644 +--- a/base/gslibctx.c ++++ b/base/gslibctx.c +@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ gs_add_control_path_len_flags(const gs_memory_t *mem, gs_path_control_t type, co + /* "%pipe%" do not follow the normal rules for path definitions, so we + don't "reduce" them to avoid unexpected results + */ +- if (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) != 0) { ++ if (path[0] == '|' || (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) == 0)) { + buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, len + 1, "gs_add_control_path_len"); + if (buffer == NULL) + return gs_error_VMerror; +@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ gs_remove_control_path_len_flags(const gs_memory_t *mem, gs_path_control_t type, + /* "%pipe%" do not follow the normal rules for path definitions, so we + don't "reduce" them to avoid unexpected results + */ +- if (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) != 0) { ++ if (path[0] == '|' || (len > 5 && memcmp(path, "%pipe", 5) == 0)) { + buffer = (char *)gs_alloc_bytes(core->memory, len + 1, "gs_remove_control_path_len"); + if (buffer == NULL) + return gs_error_VMerror; +-- +2.40.1 diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.55.0.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.55.0.bb index f29c57beeaf..48508fd6a2e 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.55.0.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.55.0.bb @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ SRC_URI_BASE = "https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/ghostpdl-downloads/releases/d file://mkdir-p.patch \ file://CVE-2022-2085.patch \ file://cve-2023-28879.patch \ + file://CVE-2023-36664-0001.patch \ + file://CVE-2023-36664-0002.patch \ " SRC_URI = "${SRC_URI_BASE} \