From: Jim Jagielski <jim@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:19:56 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Recast a vote...
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d1b1d88262daa893e40c8ce49ccb58680a530608;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

Recast a vote...


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@395929 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index d43481d401d..4e4fd73ef4c 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -77,17 +77,7 @@ PROPOSED PATCHES FOR THIS RELEASE:
    *) core: Make "Include" directives work inside previously "Include"'d
       files.
       http://people.apache.org/~colm/include_directive-1.3.patch
-      +1: colm, wrowe
-      -0: jim (do we *really* want those fprintfs?)
-        Colm says: The ap_process_include_config function is 
-        a direct copy of ap_process_resource_config(), warts
-        and all. That's where the fprintf's come from; it's
-        existing behaviour.
-        Jim asks: but aren't we already getting that info when
-        we run ap_process_resource_config()? In other words, aren't
-        we just double printing the status info? (PS: No, I haven't
-        tried the patch yet, which, of course, would answer this
-        directly :) )
+      +1: colm, wrowe, jim
 
 RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: