From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 13:39:19 +0000 (+0100) Subject: gpio: shared: fix a false-positive sharing detection with reset-gpios X-Git-Tag: v6.19-rc5~23^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d578b31856cec31315f27b3ba97b212e4c6989b3;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git gpio: shared: fix a false-positive sharing detection with reset-gpios After scanning the devicetree, we remove all entries that have only one reference, while creating GPIO shared proxies for the remaining, shared entries. However: for the reset-gpio corner-case, we will have two references for a "reset-gpios" pin that's not really shared. In this case one will come from the actual consumer fwnode and the other from the potential auxiliary reset-gpio device. This causes the GPIO core to create unnecessary GPIO shared proxy devices for pins that are not really shared. Add a function that can detect this situation and remove entries that have exactly two references but one of them is a reset-gpio. Fixes: 7b78b26757e0 ("gpio: shared: handle the reset-gpios corner case") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260108-gpio-shared-false-positive-v1-1-5dbf8d1b2f7d@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c index 076d8642675c..17343fdc9758 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct gpio_shared_ref { struct lock_class_key lock_key; struct auxiliary_device adev; struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; + bool is_reset_gpio; }; /* Represents a single GPIO pin. */ @@ -112,7 +113,8 @@ static int gpio_shared_setup_reset_proxy(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry, struct gpio_shared_ref *ref; list_for_each_entry(ref, &entry->refs, list) { - if (!ref->fwnode && ref->con_id && strcmp(ref->con_id, "reset") == 0) + if (ref->is_reset_gpio) + /* Already set-up. */ return 0; } @@ -120,6 +122,8 @@ static int gpio_shared_setup_reset_proxy(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry, if (!ref) return -ENOMEM; + ref->is_reset_gpio = true; + list_add_tail(&ref->list, &entry->refs); pr_debug("Created a secondary shared GPIO reference for potential reset-gpio device for GPIO %u at %s\n", @@ -714,12 +718,38 @@ static void __init gpio_shared_teardown(void) } } +static bool gpio_shared_entry_is_really_shared(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry) +{ + size_t num_nodes = list_count_nodes(&entry->refs); + struct gpio_shared_ref *ref; + + if (num_nodes <= 1) + return false; + + if (num_nodes > 2) + return true; + + /* Exactly two references: */ + list_for_each_entry(ref, &entry->refs, list) { + /* + * Corner-case: the second reference comes from the potential + * reset-gpio instance. However, this pin is not really shared + * as it would have three references in this case. Avoid + * creating unnecessary proxies. + */ + if (ref->is_reset_gpio) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + static void gpio_shared_free_exclusive(void) { struct gpio_shared_entry *entry, *epos; list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, epos, &gpio_shared_list, list) { - if (list_count_nodes(&entry->refs) > 1) + if (gpio_shared_entry_is_really_shared(entry)) continue; gpio_shared_drop_ref(list_first_entry(&entry->refs,