From: Andrei Pavel Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:00:18 +0000 (+0300) Subject: [#1119] rename to sendMultipleMessages4 (minor) X-Git-Tag: Kea-1.9.9~74 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d629855f4fa3489865854dde52cd2dca2e7ea48a;p=thirdparty%2Fkea.git [#1119] rename to sendMultipleMessages4 (minor) --- diff --git a/src/bin/perfdhcp/basic_scen.cc b/src/bin/perfdhcp/basic_scen.cc index 570939cdbf..a9b696f61b 100644 --- a/src/bin/perfdhcp/basic_scen.cc +++ b/src/bin/perfdhcp/basic_scen.cc @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ BasicScen::run() { // Send multiple renews to satisfy the desired rate. if (options_.getIpVersion() == 4) { - tc_.sendMultipleMessages(DHCPREQUEST, renew_packets_due); + tc_.sendMultipleMessages4(DHCPREQUEST, renew_packets_due); } else { tc_.sendMultipleMessages6(DHCPV6_RENEW, renew_packets_due); } @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ BasicScen::run() { // Send Release messages. if (options_.getIpVersion() == 4) { - tc_.sendMultipleMessages(DHCPRELEASE, release_packets_due); + tc_.sendMultipleMessages4(DHCPRELEASE, release_packets_due); } else { tc_.sendMultipleMessages6(DHCPV6_RELEASE, release_packets_due); } diff --git a/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.cc b/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.cc index a1f4f7cd55..996508ad87 100644 --- a/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.cc +++ b/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.cc @@ -553,8 +553,8 @@ TestControl::sendPackets(const uint64_t packets_num, } uint64_t -TestControl::sendMultipleMessages(const uint32_t msg_type, - const uint64_t msg_num) { +TestControl::sendMultipleMessages4(const uint32_t msg_type, + const uint64_t msg_num) { for (uint64_t i = 0; i < msg_num; ++i) { if (!sendMessageFromAck(msg_type)) { return (i); diff --git a/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.h b/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.h index 292eb36220..4346d939ad 100644 --- a/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.h +++ b/src/bin/perfdhcp/test_control.h @@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ public: /// \param msg_num A number of messages to be sent. /// /// \return A number of messages actually sent. - uint64_t sendMultipleMessages(const uint32_t msg_type, - const uint64_t msg_num); + uint64_t sendMultipleMessages4(const uint32_t msg_type, + const uint64_t msg_num); /// \brief Send number of DHCPv6 Renew or Release messages to the server. /// diff --git a/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/test_control_unittest.cc b/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/test_control_unittest.cc index 1760f4bae0..c3650698f6 100644 --- a/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/test_control_unittest.cc +++ b/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/test_control_unittest.cc @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ public: using TestControl::sendDiscover4; using TestControl::sendRequest4; using TestControl::sendPackets; - using TestControl::sendMultipleMessages; + using TestControl::sendMultipleMessages4; using TestControl::sendMultipleMessages6; using TestControl::sendRequest6; using TestControl::sendSolicit6; @@ -726,19 +726,19 @@ public: // Try to send 5 messages. It should be successful because 10 // DHCPREQUEST messages has been received. For each of them we // should be able to send renewal. - msg_num = tc.sendMultipleMessages(msg_type, 5); + msg_num = tc.sendMultipleMessages4(msg_type, 5); // Make sure that we have sent 5 messages. EXPECT_EQ(5, msg_num); // Try to do it again. We should still have 5 Reply packets for // which renews haven't been sent yet. - msg_num = tc.sendMultipleMessages(msg_type, 5); + msg_num = tc.sendMultipleMessages4(msg_type, 5); EXPECT_EQ(5, msg_num); // We used all the DHCPACK packets (we sent renew or release for each of // them already). Therefore, no further renew messages should be sent // before we acquire new leases. - msg_num = tc.sendMultipleMessages(msg_type, 5); + msg_num = tc.sendMultipleMessages4(msg_type, 5); // Make sure that no message has been sent. EXPECT_EQ(0, msg_num); }