From: Christof Schmitt Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 23:04:36 +0000 (-0700) Subject: vfs_gpfs: Remove documentation for removed gpfs:refuse_dacl_protected option X-Git-Tag: talloc-2.4.0~671 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=da663b5d4f16478973510d3b0016e41d642fa256;p=thirdparty%2Fsamba.git vfs_gpfs: Remove documentation for removed gpfs:refuse_dacl_protected option BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15211 Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt Reviewed-by: Bjoern Jacke Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 24 16:41:03 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184 --- diff --git a/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_gpfs.8.xml b/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_gpfs.8.xml index a7168e43b46..29f2ac453f0 100644 --- a/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_gpfs.8.xml +++ b/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_gpfs.8.xml @@ -252,37 +252,6 @@ - gpfs:refuse_dacl_protected = [ yes | no ] - - - As GPFS does not support the ACE4_FLAG_NO_PROPAGATE NFSv4 flag (which would be - the mapping for the DESC_DACL_PROTECTED flag), the status of this flag is - currently silently ignored by Samba. That means that if you deselect the "Allow - inheritable permissions..." checkbox in Windows' ACL dialog and then apply the - ACL, the flag will be back immediately. - - - To make sure that automatic migration with e.g. robocopy does not lead to - ACLs silently (and unintentionally) changed, you can set - gpfs:refuse_dacl_protected = yes to enable an explicit - check for this flag and if set, it will return NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED so - errors are shown up on the Windows side and the Administrator is aware of - the ACLs not being settable like intended - - - - - no(default) - ignore the DESC_DACL_PROTECTED flags. - - - yes - reject ACLs with DESC_DACL_PROTECTED. - - - - - - - gpfs:dfreequota = [ yes | no ]