From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 02:08:15 +0000 (-0700) Subject: selftests/bpf: Workaround strict bpf_lsm return value check. X-Git-Tag: v6.10.13~404 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dd7cf3b64eba74b5fa3202b5c4a0d0aad17c8af4;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git selftests/bpf: Workaround strict bpf_lsm return value check. [ Upstream commit aa8ebb270c66cea1f56a25d0f938036e91ad085a ] test_progs-no_alu32 -t libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts is being rejected by the verifier with the following error due to compiler optimization: 6: (67) r0 <<= 62 ; R0_w=scalar(smax=0x4000000000000000,umax=0xc000000000000000,smin32=0,smax32=umax32=0,var_off=(0x0; 0xc000000000000000)) 7: (c7) r0 s>>= 63 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-1,smax=smax32=0) ; @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:0 8: (57) r0 &= -13 ; R0_w=scalar(smax=0x7ffffffffffffff3,umax=0xfffffffffffffff3,smax32=0x7ffffff3,umax32=0xfffffff3,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffff3)) ; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27 9: (95) exit At program exit the register R0 has smax=9223372036854775795 should have been in [-4095, 0] Workaround by adding barrier(). Eventually the verifier will be able to recognize it. Fixes: 5d99e198be27 ("bpf, lsm: Add check for BPF LSM return value") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c index f5ac5f3e89196..568816307f712 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) if (fmode & FMODE_WRITE) return -EACCES; + barrier(); return 0; }