From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:21:23 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: A possibility for a good doc to have, since modules.apache.org isn't
X-Git-Tag: 2.3.9~379
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ddf1f4e3089a598eb1d74ff63e6067e8cd5807a6;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

A possibility for a good doc to have, since modules.apache.org isn't
actually useful.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1003288 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/docs/STATUS b/docs/STATUS
index c0c43200697..ff319a5eef1 100644
--- a/docs/STATUS
+++ b/docs/STATUS
@@ -162,6 +162,11 @@ To Do List
   helpful. Additionally, a significant part of the doc consists of a
   quoted email message. This seems somewhat unprofessional.
 
+- Is it worth having a doc that discusses recommended (what does this
+  mean?) third-party modules like mod_security, mod_php, and so on - the
+  things that we all assume everyone uses, but some folks might not know
+  about.
+
 LaTeX Todo list
 ==================