From: Marta Rybczynska Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 05:30:36 +0000 (+0200) Subject: cve-extra-inclusions: encode CPEs of affected packages X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e1bf43561093b3b9215cde9e9f7d80b4ffcdc64e;p=thirdparty%2Fopenembedded%2Fopenembedded-core-contrib.git cve-extra-inclusions: encode CPEs of affected packages Add the new cpe:vendor:product tagging to entries in cve-extra-inclusions, using product/vendor combinations that are already present in OE-core (usually there is no specific vendor). Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc index fcef6a14fb8..ffbbb7bef16 100644 --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ # # strace https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2000-0006 -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2000-0006] = "upstream-wontfix: CVE is more than 20 years old \ +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2000-0006] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:strace: CVE is more than 20 years old \ with no resolution evident. Broken links in CVE database references make resolution impractical." # epiphany https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0238 -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2005-0238] = "upstream-wontfix: \ +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2005-0238] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:epiphany: \ The issue here is spoofing of domain names using characters from other character sets. \ There has been much discussion amongst the epiphany and webkit developers and \ whilst there are improvements about how domains are handled and displayed to the user \ @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ there is unlikely ever to be a single fix to webkit or epiphany which addresses problem. There isn't any mitigation or fix or way to progress this further." # glibc https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4756 -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2010-4756] = "upstream-wontfix: \ +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2010-4756] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:glibc: \ Issue is memory exhaustion via glob() calls, e.g. from within an ftp server \ Best discussion in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681681 \ Upstream don't see it as a security issue, ftp servers shouldn't be passing \ @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ this to libc glob. Upstream have no plans to add BSD's GLOB_LIMIT or similar." # go https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-29511 CVE_STATUS_GROUPS += "CVE_STATUS_GO" CVE_STATUS_GO = "CVE-2020-29509 CVE-2020-29511" -CVE_STATUS_GO[status] = "not-applicable-config: \ +CVE_STATUS_GO[status] = "not-applicable-config: cpe:golang:go: \ The encoding/xml package in go can potentially be used for security exploits if not used correctly \ CVE applies to a netapp product as well as flagging a general issue. We don't ship anything \ exposing this interface in an exploitable way" @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ CVE-2015-2656 CVE-2015-4754 CVE-2015-4764 CVE-2015-4774 CVE-2015-4775 CVE-2015-4 CVE-2015-4778 CVE-2015-4779 CVE-2015-4780 CVE-2015-4781 CVE-2015-4782 CVE-2015-4783 CVE-2015-4784 \ CVE-2015-4785 CVE-2015-4786 CVE-2015-4787 CVE-2015-4788 CVE-2015-4789 CVE-2015-4790 CVE-2016-0682 \ CVE-2016-0689 CVE-2016-0692 CVE-2016-0694 CVE-2016-3418 CVE-2020-2981" -CVE_STATUS_DB[status] = "upstream-wontfix: Since Oracle relicensed bdb, the open source community is slowly but surely \ +CVE_STATUS_DB[status] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:berkeley_db: Since Oracle relicensed bdb, the open source community is slowly but surely \ replacing bdb with supported and open source friendly alternatives. As a result this CVE is unlikely to ever be fixed." # Kernel CVEs that are generic but can't be added to the kernel's hand-maintained cve-exclusion.inc @@ -60,25 +60,25 @@ replacing bdb with supported and open source friendly alternatives. As a result # For OE-Core our policy is to stay as close to the kernel stable releases as we can. This should # ensure the bulk of the major kernel CVEs are fixed and we don't dive into each individual issue # as the stable maintainers are much more able to do that. -CVE_STATUS[CVE-1999-0524] = "ignored: issue is that ICMP exists, can be filewalled if required" -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2008-4609] = "ignored: describes design flaws in TCP" -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2010-4563] = "ignored: low impact, only enables detection of hosts which are sniffing network traffic" -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2011-0640] = "ignored: requires physical access and any mitigation would mean USB is impractical to use" +CVE_STATUS[CVE-1999-0524] = "ignored: cpe:*:linux_kernel:issue is that ICMP exists, can be filewalled if required" +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2008-4609] = "ignored: cpe:*:linux_kernel:describes design flaws in TCP" +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2010-4563] = "ignored: cpe:*:linux_kernel:low impact, only enables detection of hosts which are sniffing network traffic" +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2011-0640] = "ignored: cpe:*:linux_kernel:requires physical access and any mitigation would mean USB is impractical to use" # qemu:qemu-native:qemu-system-native https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20255 -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2021-20255] = "upstream-wontfix: \ +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2021-20255] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:qemu: \ There was a proposed patch https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg06098.html \ qemu maintainers say the patch is incorrect and should not be applied \ The issue is of low impact, at worst sitting in an infinite loop rather than exploitable." # qemu:qemu-native:qemu-system-native https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12067 -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2019-12067] = "upstream-wontfix: \ +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2019-12067] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:qemu: \ There was a proposed patch but rejected by upstream qemu. It is unclear if the issue can \ still be reproduced or where exactly any bug is. \ We'll pick up any fix when upstream accepts one." # nasm:nasm-native https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-18974 -CVE_STATUS[CVE-2020-18974] = "upstream-wontfix: \ +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2020-18974] = "upstream-wontfix: cpe:*:netwide_assembler: \ It is a fuzzing related buffer overflow. It is of low impact since most devices \ wouldn't expose an assembler. The upstream is inactive and there is little to be \ done about the bug, ignore from an OE perspective."