From: Justin Erenkrantz Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:18:37 +0000 (+0000) Subject: More campaigning from those pesty developers wanting their code changes X-Git-Tag: STRIKER_2_0_51_RC1^2~29 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e2413d0f4cf678109bd191ab2a298d728d52d10a;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git More campaigning from those pesty developers wanting their code changes approved for a small donation of time. Just say no! ;-) git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/APACHE_2_0_BRANCH@104839 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 39e62160d9d..7a120f6a871 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2004/08/26 21:06:13 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2004/08/26 21:18:37 $] Release: @@ -163,7 +163,10 @@ PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM 2.1 jerenkrantz asks: Isn't this what apr_table_merge is for? nd replies: yep. But cookies won't be merged, because browsers don't support it. - +1: nd + jerenkrantz: Couldn't we copy the table and merge the values somehow? + This just seems like a lot of code to duplicate what we + have already. *shrug* Regardless, patch looks okay... + +1: nd, jerenkrantz *) Fix memory leak in mod_rewrite. PR 27862. (2.0 + 1.3) http://www.apache.org/~nd/mod_rewrite_fixleak.diff @@ -186,7 +189,10 @@ PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM 2.1 completely forgotten where. nd: we stop recursions in the core now (for subrequests and internal redirects). Therefore the check here is no longer necessary. - +1: nd + jerenkrantz: Aha. ap_is_recursion_limit_exceeded() is the function + I was thinking of, but couldn't find. (I was searching for + 'recursive' not 'recursion'.) + +1: nd, jerenkrantz *) mod_dav: Send an EOS at the end of the multistatus brigade. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/dav/main/mod_dav.c?r1=1.105&r2=1.106