From: Jason Merrill Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:50:52 +0000 (-0500) Subject: re PR c++/60252 ([c++11] ICE with invalid variable-length array in lambda parameter) X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-4.9.0~759 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e7b67047c79d2ea6867ed15b6441960219d77f29;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git re PR c++/60252 ([c++11] ICE with invalid variable-length array in lambda parameter) PR c++/60252 * lambda.c (maybe_resolve_dummy): Check lambda_function rather than current_binding_level. From-SVN: r208028 --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index 8e4a2a0d9d1e..dd926daa4202 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2014-02-21 Jason Merrill + PR c++/60252 + * lambda.c (maybe_resolve_dummy): Check lambda_function rather + than current_binding_level. + PR c++/60186 * typeck2.c (massage_init_elt): Call fold_non_dependent_expr_sfinae. diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.c b/gcc/cp/lambda.c index 7fe235b57024..277dec6d2b9d 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.c +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.c @@ -749,10 +749,8 @@ maybe_resolve_dummy (tree object) if (type != current_class_type && current_class_type && LAMBDA_TYPE_P (current_class_type) - && DERIVED_FROM_P (type, current_nonlambda_class_type ()) - /* If we get here while parsing the parameter list of a lambda, it - will fail, so don't even try (c++/60252). */ - && current_binding_level->kind != sk_function_parms) + && lambda_function (current_class_type) + && DERIVED_FROM_P (type, current_nonlambda_class_type ())) { /* In a lambda, need to go through 'this' capture. */ tree lam = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (current_class_type);