From: Jan Hubicka Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 07:14:46 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Re-add logic to mitigate some afdo profile inconsistencies X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f0b3c57ea6b87f51eb0a9bfd7c4438625cb7ed17;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git Re-add logic to mitigate some afdo profile inconsistencies This patch re-adds logic to increase counts of annotated basic blocks if otherwise the Kirhoff law can not be solved. This is done only in easy cases where total count of in or out edges is smaller than the count of BB or when BB has single exit which is annotated by small count. This helps to solve problems seen i.e. in parest where header of loops gets too low count because vectorizer replaced the IV condiitonal and did not preserved debug info. We should solve the debug info issues as well, and simiar problems can now be tracked by in afdo debug dumps. gcc/ChangeLog: * auto-profile.cc (autofdo_source_profile::offline_external_functions): Add missing newline in dump. (afdo_propagate_edge): If annotated BB or edge has too small count bump it up to mitigate profile imprecisions caused by vectorizer. (afdo_propagate): Increase number of iteraitons and fix dump --- diff --git a/gcc/auto-profile.cc b/gcc/auto-profile.cc index 44e7faa8fee..d78f2cb42b5 100644 --- a/gcc/auto-profile.cc +++ b/gcc/auto-profile.cc @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ autofdo_source_profile::offline_external_functions () if (dump_file) fprintf (dump_file, "string table in auto-profile contains" - " duplicated name %s", n1); + " duplicated name %s\n", n1); to_symbol_name.put (i, index); } continue; @@ -2491,6 +2491,21 @@ afdo_propagate_edge (bool is_succ, bb_set *annotated_bb) set_bb_annotated (bb, annotated_bb); changed = true; } + else if (is_bb_annotated (bb, *annotated_bb) + && bb->count < total_known_count) + { + if (dump_file) + { + fprintf (dump_file, " Increasing bb %i count from ", + bb->index); + bb->count.dump (dump_file); + fprintf (dump_file, " to "); + total_known_count.dump (dump_file); + fprintf (dump_file, " hoping to mitigate afdo inconsistency\n"); + } + bb->count = total_known_count; + changed = true; + } else if (num_unknown_edges == 1 && is_bb_annotated (bb, *annotated_bb)) { if (bb->count > total_known_count) @@ -2533,6 +2548,27 @@ afdo_propagate_edge (bool is_succ, bb_set *annotated_bb) } } } + else if (num_unknown_edges == 0 + && is_bb_annotated (bb, *annotated_bb) + && (is_succ ? single_succ_p (bb) : single_pred_p (bb))) + { + edge e = is_succ ? single_succ_edge (bb) : single_pred_edge (bb); + if (AFDO_EINFO (e)->is_annotated () + && AFDO_EINFO (e)->get_count () < bb->count) + { + if (dump_file) + { + fprintf (dump_file, " Increasing edge %i->%i count from ", + e->src->index, e->dest->index); + AFDO_EINFO (e)->get_count ().dump (dump_file); + fprintf (dump_file, " to "); + bb->count.dump (dump_file); + fprintf (dump_file, " hoping to mitigate afdo inconsistency\n"); + } + AFDO_EINFO (e)->set_count (bb->count); + changed = true; + } + } } return changed; } @@ -2662,10 +2698,11 @@ afdo_propagate (bb_set *annotated_bb) ((basic_block)bb->aux)->index, bb->index); bb->count.dump (dump_file); + fprintf (dump_file, "\n"); } } - while (changed && i++ < 10) + while (changed && i++ < 100) { changed = false; @@ -2676,7 +2713,7 @@ afdo_propagate (bb_set *annotated_bb) afdo_propagate_circuit (*annotated_bb); } if (dump_file) - fprintf (dump_file, "Propated in %i iterations %s\n", + fprintf (dump_file, "Propagation took %i iterations %s\n", i, changed ? "; iteration limit reached\n" : ""); }