From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 02:07:30 +0000 (+0100) Subject: dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix confusing cleanup.h syntax X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f9ef8dedee34e2d7828d5a6a0643cd969aaa8437;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix confusing cleanup.h syntax Initializing automatic __free variables to NULL without need (e.g. branches with different allocations), followed by actual allocation is in contrary to explicit coding rules guiding cleanup.h: "Given that the "__free(...) = NULL" pattern for variables defined at the top of the function poses this potential interdependency problem the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the function when __free() is used." Code does not have a bug, but is less readable and uses discouraged coding practice, so fix that by moving declaration to the place of assignment. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251208020729.4654-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul --- diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c index 3371e0a76d3ca..e9caf8adca1fc 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c @@ -161,13 +161,13 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pid) { struct dw_edma_pcie_data *pdata = (void *)pid->driver_data; - struct dw_edma_pcie_data *vsec_data __free(kfree) = NULL; struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct dw_edma_chip *chip; int err, nr_irqs; int i, mask; - vsec_data = kmalloc(sizeof(*vsec_data), GFP_KERNEL); + struct dw_edma_pcie_data *vsec_data __free(kfree) = + kmalloc(sizeof(*vsec_data), GFP_KERNEL); if (!vsec_data) return -ENOMEM;