From: Ilya Leoshkevich Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 17:58:32 +0000 (+0200) Subject: target/s390x: Use address generation for register branch targets X-Git-Tag: v10.2.0-rc1~25^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fc976a67ded4232cf0b9ae3c11fe051da01e4456;p=thirdparty%2Fqemu.git target/s390x: Use address generation for register branch targets Indirect branches to addresses taken from registers go through address generation, e.g., for BRANCH ON CONDITION Principles of Operation says: In the RR format, the contents of general register R2 are used to generate the branch address QEMU uses r2_nz handler for the respective register operands. Currently it does not zero out extra bits in 24- and 31-bit addressing modes as required by address generation. The very frequently used s390x_tr_init_disas_context() function has a workaround for this, but the code for saving an old PSW during an interrupt does not. Add the missing masking to r2_nz. Enforce PSW validity by replacing the workaround with an assertion. Reported-by: Thomas Weißschuh Reported-by: Heiko Carstens Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ab3131a2-c42a-47ff-bf03-e9f68ac053c0@t-8ch.de/ Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Tested-by: Thomas Weißschuh Message-ID: <20251016175954.41153-4-iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c b/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c index ec9e5a0751..4d2b8c5e2b 100644 --- a/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c +++ b/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c @@ -5613,6 +5613,7 @@ static void in2_r2_nz(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o) int r2 = get_field(s, r2); if (r2 != 0) { o->in2 = load_reg(r2); + gen_addi_and_wrap_i64(s, o->in2, o->in2, 0); } } #define SPEC_in2_r2_nz 0 @@ -6379,10 +6380,12 @@ static void s390x_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs) { DisasContext *dc = container_of(dcbase, DisasContext, base); - /* 31-bit mode */ - if (!(dc->base.tb->flags & FLAG_MASK_64)) { - dc->base.pc_first &= 0x7fffffff; - dc->base.pc_next = dc->base.pc_first; + if (dc->base.tb->flags & FLAG_MASK_32) { + if (!(dc->base.tb->flags & FLAG_MASK_64)) { + assert(!(dc->base.pc_first & ~((1ULL << 31) - 1))); + } + } else { + assert(!(dc->base.pc_first & ~((1ULL << 24) - 1))); } dc->cc_op = CC_OP_DYNAMIC;