From: Nick Kew <niq@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:06:52 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Propose, vote, comment
X-Git-Tag: 2.2.7~350
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fdcff487d1ffb209298c6aa8c3bb88a7856b99e1;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

Propose, vote, comment


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@581408 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 306db96a180..62bbbade308 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -167,10 +167,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
       Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
          Trunk version of patch works
       +1: jim, rpluem
-      -1: niq: Due to PR#43519, this will generate 403s and lots of
-               new pollution in the error log!
-          jim asks: Huh? I can't recreate this... If true, then OPTIONS
-                    is seriously hosed.
+      niq says: -1 while we have PR#43519; +1 contingent on a fix
+      to that being backported.
 
    * core log.c: Authored and Reviewed by both rplume and wrowe within 
      the same 10 minutes, share only a single apr_file_t/fd between the
@@ -231,6 +229,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      +0: rpluem says: Please give struct foo a meaningful name first.
      -0: jim says: Agree with rpluem. Actually, I'd veto this patch
                    based simply on that naming if I could.
+     niq: changed the name.  Resisted temptation to use "pooltabletime".
 
    * mod_proxy_http: Remove Warning headers with wrong date
      PR 16138
@@ -239,11 +238,13 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      +0: rpluem says: Please give struct foo a meaningful name first.
      -0: jim says: Agree with rpluem. Actually, I'd veto this patch
                    based simply on that naming if I could.
+     niq: changed the name.  Resisted temptation to use "pooltabletime".
 
-   * mod_authz_host: Accept OPTIONS * without reference to filesystem
-     PR 43519
-     Trunk: n/a (LATER)
-     2.2.x: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20902
+   * mod_proxy: Don't by default violate RFC2616 by setting
+     Max-Forwards when the client didn't send it to us.
+     PR 16137
+     http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=581117 (code)
+     http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=581253 (docs)
      +1: niq
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED