]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/linux.git/log
thirdparty/kernel/linux.git
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .get_freq hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:56 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .get_freq hook

Add .get_freq hook to support dpll framework for MTL+
platforms.

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-27-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .get_hw_state hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:55 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .get_hw_state hook

Add .get_hw_state hook to MTL+ platforms for dpll framework.

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-26-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add .compare_hw_state hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:54 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add .compare_hw_state hook

Add .compare_hw_state function pointer for MTL+ platforms
to support dpll framework.

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-25-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .dump_hw_state hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:53 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .dump_hw_state hook

Add .dump_hw_state function pointer for MTL+ platforms
to support dpll framework. While at it, switch to use
drm_printer structure to print hw state information.

v2: Keep debug messages on one line if they not
    necessarily needed to split into two or more
    lines (Suraj)

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-24-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .update_dpll_ref_clks hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:52 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .update_dpll_ref_clks hook

Add .update_dpll_ref_clks function pointer to MTL+
platforms to support dpll framework. Reuse ICL
function pointer.

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-23-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .update_active_dpll hook
Mika Kahola [Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:28:30 +0000 (15:28 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .update_active_dpll hook

Add .update_active_dpll function pointer to support
dpll framework. Reuse ICL function pointer.

v2: Add check for !HAS_LT_PHY (Suraj)
v3: Remove the incorrect !HAS_LT_PHY condition and
    check for existing dpll_mgr

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> # v1
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251118132830.2584422-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .put_dplls hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:50 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .put_dplls hook

Add .put_dplls function pointer to support MTL+ platforms
on dpll framework. Reuse ICL function pointer.

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-21-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .get_dplls hook
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:49 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add MTL+ .get_dplls hook

Add .get_dplls function pointer for MTL+ platforms
to support dpll framework. Reuse the ICL function
pointer.

v2: Getting configuration either for a C10 or on the PTL port B
    eDP on TypeC PHY case for a C20 PHY PLL. Hence refer to this
    case as "non_tc_phy" instead of "c10phy".
v3: Fix comment to "eDP over TypeC" (Suraj)
    Fix pll id as separate variable (Suraj)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-20-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Compute plls for MTL+ platform
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:48 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Compute plls for MTL+ platform

To bring MTL+ platform aligned call and calculate PLL state
from dpll framework.

v2: Rename mtl_compute_c10phy_dpll() to mtl_compute_non_tc_phy_dpll().
    The state is computed either for a C10 or on the PTL port B eDP
    over TypeC PHY case for a C20 PHY PLL. Hence refer to this case as
    "non_tc_phy" instead of "c10phy".

    Rename mtl_compute_c20phy_dplls() to mtl_compute_tc_phy_dplls() for
    symmetry with mtl_compute_non_tc_phy_dpll().
v3: Reword commit message (Suraj)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-19-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Update C10/C20 state calculation
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:47 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Update C10/C20 state calculation

Update several functions in intel_cx0_phy.c to make PLL state
management more explicit.

Changes include
 * add 'const' qualifiers to intel_crtc_state parameter for
   cx0 state calculation functions
 * refactor C10/C20 PLL state calculations helpers to take
   explicit hardware state pointers instead of directly modifying
   'crtc_state->dpll_hw_state'

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-18-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add PLL information for MTL+
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:46 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add PLL information for MTL+

Start bringing MTL+ platforms as part of PLL framework.
The work is started by adding PLL information and related
function hooks.

BSpec: 55726

v2: Revise commit message and add BSpec ID (Suraj)

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-17-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Remove state verification
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:45 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Remove state verification

When pll's are moved to dpll framework we no longer
need Cx0 specific state verification as we can rely
on dpll state verification instead.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-16-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Print additional Cx0 PLL HW state
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:44 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Print additional Cx0 PLL HW state

Print all the Cx0 PLL state in the PLL state dumper.

v2: Use BUILD_BUG_ON() instead of WARN_ON() (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-15-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Zero Cx0 PLL state before compute and HW readout
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:43 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Zero Cx0 PLL state before compute and HW readout

Ensure Cx0 pll state is initialized to zero before any computation or HW
readouts, to prevent leaving some parameter in the state uninitialized
in the actual compute/HW readout functions later.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-14-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Determine Cx0 PLL port clock from PLL state
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:42 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Determine Cx0 PLL port clock from PLL state

The port clock is tracked in the PLL state, so there is no need to pass
it separately to __intel_cx0pll_enable(). Drop the port clock function
param accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-13-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Determine Cx0 PLL DP mode from PLL state
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:41 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Determine Cx0 PLL DP mode from PLL state

The Cx0 PLL enable programming needs to know if the PLL is in DP or HDMI
mode. The PLL manager framework doesn't pass the CRTC state to the PLL's
enable hook, so prepare here for the conversion to use the PLL manager
for Cx0 PHY PLLs by determining the DP/HDMI mode from the PLL state.

For C10 PHYs use the fact that the HDMI divider value in the PLL
registers are set if and only if the PLL is in HDMI mode.

For C20 PHYs use the DP mode flag programmed to the VDR SERDES register,
which is set if and only if the PLL is in DP mode.

Assert that the above PLL/VDR SERDES register values match the DP/HDMI
mode being configured already during state computation.

This also allows dropping the is_dp param from the
__intel_cx0pll_enable() function, since it can retrieve this now from
the PLL state.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-12-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Read out the Cx0 PHY SSC enabled state
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:40 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Read out the Cx0 PHY SSC enabled state

Read out the C10, C20 PHY PLLs SSC enabled state, so the PLL HW/SW state
verification can check this state as well.

C10 PHY PLLs program some PLL registers zeroed out for the non-SSC case,
while programming non-zero values to the same registers for the SSC
case, so check that these PLL registers being zero or non-zero matches
the PLL's overall SSC-enabled state (stored in the
intel_c10pll_state::ssc_enabled flag).

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-11-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Sanitize C10 PHY PLL SSC register setup
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:39 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Sanitize C10 PHY PLL SSC register setup

Define the C10 PLL SSC register range via macros, so the HW/SW state of
these register can be verified by a follow-up change, reusing these
macros.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-10-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Track the Cx0 PHY enabled lane count in the PLL state
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:38 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Track the Cx0 PHY enabled lane count in the PLL state

The Cx0 PLL enable programming requires the enabled lane count. The PLL
manager framework doesn't pass the CRTC state to the PLL's enable hook,
so prepare here for the conversion to use the PLL manager, by tracking
the enabled lane count in the PLL state as well. This has the advantage,
that the enabled lane count can be verified against the PHY/PLL's
enabled TX lanes.

This also allows dropping the lane count param from the
__intel_cx0pll_enable() function, since it can retrieve this now from
the PLL state.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-9-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Add macro to get DDI port width from a register value
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:37 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Add macro to get DDI port width from a register value

A follow-up change will need to retrieve the DDI port field from the
register value, add a macro for this. Make things symmetric with setting
the field in the register.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-8-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Move definition of Cx0 PHY functions earlier
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:36 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Move definition of Cx0 PHY functions earlier

Move the definitions of the
  intel_c10pll_calc_port_clock()
  intel_c20_get_dp_rate()
  intel_c20_get_hdmi_rate()
  is_hdmi_frl()
  is_dp2()
  intel_get_c20_custom_width()
functions earlier to avoid the forward declarations.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-7-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Track the C20 PHY VDR state in the PLL state
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:35 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Track the C20 PHY VDR state in the PLL state

The Cx0 PLL enable programming needs to know if the PLL is in DP or HDMI
mode. The PLL manager framework doesn't pass the CRTC state to the PLL's
enable hook, so prepare here for the conversion to use the PLL manager
for Cx0 PHY PLLs by tracking the DP/HDMI mode in the PLL state.

This change has the advantage, that the VDR HW/SW state can be verified
now.

A follow up change will convert the PLL enable function to retrieve the
DP/HDMI mode parameter from the PLL state.

This also allows dropping the is_dp and port clock params from the
intel_c20_pll_program() function, since it can retrieve these now from
the PLL state.

v2: Fix comment to under same multicomment line (Suraj)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-6-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Sanitize calculating C20 PLL state from tables
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:34 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Sanitize calculating C20 PLL state from tables

A follow up change adds a computation for the C20 PLL VDR state, which
is common to both the HDMI algorithmic and DP/HDMI table based method.
To prepare for that streamline the code. The C10 counterpart would
benefit from the same change, leave that for later adding a TODO
comment.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-5-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Sanitize setting the Cx0 PLL use_c10 flag
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:33 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Sanitize setting the Cx0 PLL use_c10 flag

Sanitize setting the Cx0 PLL use_c10 flag during state computation and
HW readout, making sure they happen the same way in the
intel_c{10,20}pll_calc_state() and intel_c{10,20}pll_readout_hw_state()
functions.

Follow-up changes will add more state computation/HW readout, this
change prepares for those as well.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-4-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Factor out C10 msgbus access start/end helpers
Imre Deak [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:32 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Factor out C10 msgbus access start/end helpers

Factor out functions to begin and complete C10 PHY programming
sequences to make the code more concise.

v2: Rename msgbus_update_config() to more descriptive
    msg_bus_access_commit() (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-3-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Rename TBT functions to be ICL specific
Mika Kahola [Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:45:31 +0000 (12:45 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Rename TBT functions to be ICL specific

Rename pll functions to include ICL platform as these are
used from ICL onwards.

Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117104602.2363671-2-mika.kahola@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/fbdev: Hold runtime PM ref during fbdev BO creation
Dibin Moolakadan Subrahmanian [Tue, 11 Nov 2025 13:54:03 +0000 (19:24 +0530)] 
drm/i915/fbdev: Hold runtime PM ref during fbdev BO creation

During fbdev probe, the xe driver allocates and pins a framebuffer
BO (via xe_bo_create_pin_map_novm() → xe_ggtt_insert_bo()).

Without a runtime PM reference, xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume() warns about
missing outer PM protection as below:

xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Missing outer runtime PM protection

Acquire a runtime PM reference before framebuffer allocation to ensure
xe_ggtt_insert_bo()  executes  under active runtime PM context.

Changes in v2:
 - Update commit message to add Fixes tag (Jani Nikula)

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/6350
Fixes: 44e694958b95 ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dibin Moolakadan Subrahmanian <dibin.moolakadan.subrahmanian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251111135403.3415947-1-dibin.moolakadan.subrahmanian@intel.com
2 months agodrm/i915/fbc: Apply Wa_15018326506
Vinod Govindapillai [Tue, 11 Nov 2025 12:46:06 +0000 (14:46 +0200)] 
drm/i915/fbc: Apply Wa_15018326506

Disable FBC in bmg as per the wa recommendation.

v2: use the bmg platform instead of a specific stepping

v3: wa to Wa

Bspec: 74212
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Acked-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251111124606.402380-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/display: Add default case to mipi_exec_send_packet
Jonathan Cavitt [Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:41:51 +0000 (16:41 +0000)] 
drm/i915/display: Add default case to mipi_exec_send_packet

Add a default case to the switch case statement in mipi_exec_send_packet
to prevent attempts to read an uninitialized ret value.  It's unlikely
the default case will ever occur during regular exeuction, but if more
MIPI DSI Processor-to-Peripheral transaction types are ever added, then
having this in place will be a useful safety guard.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Fixes: 23db1577ce2d ("drm/i915/dsi: log send packet sequence errors")
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251104164150.16795-2-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/xe: remove stale runtime_pm member
Jani Nikula [Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:55:47 +0000 (20:55 +0200)] 
drm/xe: remove stale runtime_pm member

This has become unused and unnecessary. Remove.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251112185547.172113-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/ltphy: include intel_display_utils.h instead of i915_utils.h
Jani Nikula [Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:13:42 +0000 (20:13 +0200)] 
drm/i915/ltphy: include intel_display_utils.h instead of i915_utils.h

Display code stopped using i915_utils.h in favour of
intel_display_utils.h. Fix recent additions.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251112181342.107911-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/cursor: Initialize 845 vs 865 cursor size separately
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:26 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cursor: Initialize 845 vs 865 cursor size separately

The if+ternary combo used for the max cursor width initialization
on 845/865 is rather cumbersome. Just split this into a straight
up if ladder.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/cursor: Extract intel_cursor_mode_config_init()
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:25 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cursor: Extract intel_cursor_mode_config_init()

Move the max cursor size initialization into intel_cursor.c
so that all the platform specific details about cursors are
concentrated in one file.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915: Use mode_config->cursor_width for cursor DDB allocation
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:24 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915: Use mode_config->cursor_width for cursor DDB allocation

Replace the hardcoded 256 with mode_config->cursor_width
when doing the cursor DDB allocation. Currently 256 is correct
for all SKL+, but this might change in the future. One less place
to change should that happen.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/wm: Use drm_get_format_info() in SKL+ cursor DDB allocation
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:23 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915/wm: Use drm_get_format_info() in SKL+ cursor DDB allocation

Replace the technically inaccurate drm_format_info() with the
accurate drm_get_format_info() in the SKL+ cursor DDB
allocation code.

Since we're only interested in the linear modifier here, the two
functions do actually return the same information. But let's not
use drm_format_info() to avoid setting a bad example.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/fb: Init 'ret' in each error branch in intel_framebuffer_init()
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:22 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915/fb: Init 'ret' in each error branch in intel_framebuffer_init()

Make the order of things a bit less fragile in
intel_framebuffer_init() by assigning 'ret' in each
error branch instead of depending on some earlier
assignment.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915: Nuke intel_plane_config.tiling
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:21 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915: Nuke intel_plane_config.tiling

Use intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling() to convert the modifier into
the fence tiling mode during BIOS FB readout, rather than hand
rolling it. With this we can also stop tracking the tiling mode
in the intel_plane_config.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915: Populate fb->format accurately in BIOS FB readout
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:20 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915: Populate fb->format accurately in BIOS FB readout

Use drm_get_format_info() instead of drm_format_info() to populate
fb->format during the BIOS FB readout. The difference being that
drm_get_format_info() knows about compressed formats whereas
drm_format_info() doesn't.

This doesn't actually matter in practice since the BIOS FB should
never be compressed, but no reason we shouldn't use the more accurate
function here anyway.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915: Pass drm_format_info into plane->max_stride()
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:19 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915: Pass drm_format_info into plane->max_stride()

Pass the format info into plane->max_stride() from the
caller instead of doing yet another drm_format_info()
lookup on the spot.

drm_format_info() is both rather expensive, and technically
incorrect since it doesn't return the correct format info
for compressed formats (though that doesn't actually matter
for the current .max_stride() implementations since they
are just interested in the cpp value).

Most callers already have the format info available. The
only exception is intel_dumb_fb_max_stride() where we shall
use the actually correct drm_get_format_info() variant.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915: Introduce intel_dumb_fb_max_stride()
Ville Syrjälä [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:11:18 +0000 (20:11 +0200)] 
drm/i915: Introduce intel_dumb_fb_max_stride()

Wrap intel_plane_fb_max_stride() in intel_dumb_fb_max_stride()
for the purposes of dumb fb creation. I want to change
intel_plane_fb_max_stride() to take a 'struct drm_format_info'
instead of the 'u32 pixel_format' so we need an excplicit format
info lookup in the dumb fb path and I don't really want to have
that in i915_gem_dumb_create() directly.

This makes intel_plane_fb_max_stride() internal to the display
code again, and thus we can pass in struct intel_display instead
of struct drm_device.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107181126.5743-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/dpio: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:55 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/dpio: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value

Utilize the 'out_value' output parameter of intel_de_wait_ms()
instead of re-reading the DPLL/DPIO_PHY_STATUS register after
polling has finished.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:54 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value

Utilize the 'out_value' output parameter of intel_de_wait_ms()
instead of re-reading the PHY_CONTROL register after polling
has finished.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with intel_de_wait_fw_us_ato...
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:53 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic()

Nuke the remaining _nowl() stuff from the wakelock code in the
form of __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(), and replace it with
intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic() that uses the low level _fw() register
accessors in line with the rest of the code.

No change in behaviour since wakelocks are only supported on xe,
and xe doesn't have uncore.lock nor unclaimed register detection
stuff.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:52 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms()

The low level _fw() register accessors aren't supposed to
grab the wakelock. Stop doing so in intel_de_wait_fw_ms().

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:51 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw()

We already have the lower level intel_de_*_fw() stuff, so use
that instead of hand rolling something custom for the DMC
wakelock stuff.

As the wakelock stuff exists only on platforms supported
by the xe driver this doesn't even result in any functional
changes since xe doesn't have uncore.lock nor unclaimed
register access detection.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:50 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms()

_bxt_dpio_phy_init() doesn't us the _fw() register accessors
for anything else, so stop using them for the register polling
as well.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:49 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms()

Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms() instead of
intel_de_wait_ms() where appropriate.

Done with cocci (with manual formatting fixes):
@@
identifier func !~ "intel_de_wait_for";
expression display, reg, mask, timeout_ms;
@@
func(...)
{
<...
(
- intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, mask, timeout_ms, NULL)
+ intel_de_wait_for_set_ms(display, reg, mask, timeout_ms)
|
- intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, 0, timeout_ms, NULL)
+ intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms(display, reg, mask, timeout_ms)
)
...>
}

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:48 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()

Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us() instead of
intel_de_wait_us() where appropriate.

Done with cocci (with manual formatting fixes):
@@
identifier func !~ "intel_de_wait_for";
expression display, reg, mask, timeout_us;
@@
func(...)
{
<...
(
- intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, mask, timeout_us, NULL)
+ intel_de_wait_for_set_us(display, reg, mask, timeout_us)
|
- intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, 0, timeout_us, NULL)
+ intel_de_wait_for_clear_us(display, reg, mask, timeout_us)
)
...>
}

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:47 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()

Add intel_de_wait_for_set_us() and intel_de_wait_for_clear_us()
as the microsecond counterparts to intel_de_wait_for_set_ms()
and intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms().

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:46 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom()

intel_de_wait_custom() is finally unused. Get rid of it
before people start abusing it more.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:45 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases

Replace some users of intel_de_wait_custom() with intel_de_wait_ms().

This includes the cases where we pass in the default 2 microsecond
fast timeout, which is also what intel_de_wait_ms() uses so there
are no functional changes here.

Done with cocci (with manual formatting fixes):
@@
expression display, reg, mask, value, timeout_ms, out_value;
@@
- intel_de_wait_custom(display, reg, mask, value, 2, timeout_ms, out_value)
+ intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, value, timeout_ms, out_value)

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:44 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us()

Convert some of the intel_de_wait_custom() users over to
intel_de_wait_us(). We'll eventually want to eliminate
intel_de_wait_custom() as it's a hinderance towards using
poll_timeout_us().

This includes all the obvious cases where we only specify
a microsecond timeout to intel_de_wait_custom().

Done with cocci (with manual formatting fixes):
@@
expression display, reg, mask, value, timeout_us, out_value;
@@
- intel_de_wait_custom(display, reg, mask, value, timeout_us, 0, out_value)
+ intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, value, timeout_us, out_value)

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us()
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:43 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us()

Introduce intel_de_wait_us() as the microsecond based
counterpart to the millisecond based intel_de_wait_ms().

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:42 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names

intel_de_wait*() take the timeout in milliseconds. Include
that information in the function name to make life less
confusing. I'll also be introducing microsecond variants
of these later.

Done with cocci:
@@
@@
(
static int
- intel_de_wait
+ intel_de_wait_ms
 (...)
{
...
}
|
static int
- intel_de_wait_fw
+ intel_de_wait_fw_ms
 (...)
{
...
}
|
static int
- intel_de_wait_for_set
+ intel_de_wait_for_set_ms
 (...)
{
...
}
|
static int
- intel_de_wait_for_clear
+ intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms
 (...)
{
...
}
)

@@
@@
(
- intel_de_wait
+ intel_de_wait_ms
|
- intel_de_wait_fw
+ intel_de_wait_fw_ms
|
- intel_de_wait_for_set
+ intel_de_wait_for_set_ms
|
- intel_de_wait_for_clear
+ intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms
)

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:41 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value

We currently have a bunch of places that want the final register
value after register polling. Currently those places are mostly
using intel_de_wait_custom(). That is not a function that we
want to keep around as it pretty much prevents conversion to
poll_timeout_us().

Have intel_de_wait() also return the final register value so
that some of the current users can be converted over to the
simpler interface.

Done with cocci:
@@
@@
int intel_de_wait(...
+ ,u32 *out_value
 )
{
...
__intel_wait_for_register(...,
- NULL
+ out_value
 )
...
}

@@
@@
 intel_de_wait(...
+ ,NULL
 )

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way
Ville Syrjälä [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:27:40 +0000 (19:27 +0200)] 
drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way

Currently we use a messy mix of intel_wait_for_register*()
and __intel_wait_for_register*() to implement various
register polling functions. Make the mess a bit more understandable
by always using the __intel_wait_for_register*() stuff.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/rom: convert intel_rom interfaces to struct drm_device
Jani Nikula [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 11:20:48 +0000 (13:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/rom: convert intel_rom interfaces to struct drm_device

Reduce the display dependency on struct drm_i915_private and i915_drv.h
by converting the rom interface to struct drm_device.

Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110112048.2366725-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agoMerge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next
Jani Nikula [Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:32:07 +0000 (12:32 +0200)] 
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Primarily sync with the drm_print.h changes from drm-misc.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/dp_mst: Disable Panel Replay
Imre Deak [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 12:41:41 +0000 (14:41 +0200)] 
drm/i915/dp_mst: Disable Panel Replay

Disable Panel Replay on MST links until it's properly implemented. For
instance the required VSC SDP is not programmed on MST and FEC is not
enabled if Panel Replay is enabled.

Fixes: 3257e55d3ea7 ("drm/i915/panelreplay: enable/disable panel replay")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/15174
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.8+
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107124141.911895-1-imre.deak@intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/ltphy: Return lowest portclock for HDMI from reverse algorithm
Suraj Kandpal [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 06:19:41 +0000 (11:49 +0530)] 
drm/i915/ltphy: Return lowest portclock for HDMI from reverse algorithm

Return the lowest port clock for HDMI when the reverse algorithm
calculates it to be 0 to avoid errors later but throw a warn.

Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110061940.545183-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/ltphy: Implement HDMI Algo for Pll state
Suraj Kandpal [Mon, 10 Nov 2025 06:19:40 +0000 (11:49 +0530)] 
drm/i915/ltphy: Implement HDMI Algo for Pll state

Implement the HDMI Algorithm to dynamically create LT PHY state
based on the port clock provided.

Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110061940.545183-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/pmdemand: Use the default 2 usec fast polling timeout
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:49 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/pmdemand: Use the default 2 usec fast polling timeout

For whatever unknown reason the pmdemand code is using a custom
50 usec fast polling timeout instead of the normal 2 usec
value. Switch to the standard value to get rid of the special
case.

The eventual aim is to get rid of the fast vs. slow timeout
entirely and switch over to poll_timeout_us().

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/hdcp: Use the default 2 usec fast polling timeout
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:48 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/hdcp: Use the default 2 usec fast polling timeout

For whatever unknown reason the HDCP code is using a custom
10 usec fast polling timeout instead of the normal 2 usec
value. Switch to the standard value to get rid of the special
case.

The eventual aim is to get rid of the fast vs. slow timeout
entirely and switch over to poll_timeout_us().

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/ltphy: Nuke bogus weird timeouts
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:47 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/ltphy: Nuke bogus weird timeouts

The LT PHY code is abusing intel_de_wait_custom() in all kinds of weird
ways. Get rid of the weird fast timeouts, and just use the slow ones.
For consistency with intel_wait_for_register() we'll stick to the
default 2 usec fast timeout for all cases.

Someone really needs to properly document where all these magic numbers
came from...

This will let us eventually nuke intel_de_wait_custom() and convert
over to poll_timeout_us().

v2: Go for the longer (ms) timeout in case it actually matters

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/cx0: s/XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT/XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT_MS/
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:52:49 +0000 (17:52 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: s/XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT/XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT_MS/

Include the units the in the define name for XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT
to make it match all its other counterparts.

v2: It's _MS not _US (Jani)

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106155249.2810-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/cx0: s/XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_SLOW/XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_MS/
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:45 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: s/XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_SLOW/XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_MS/

The slow vs. fast timeout stuff is really just an implementation
detail. Let's not spread that terminology in random timeout defines.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Get rid of XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_FAST_US
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:44 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Get rid of XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_FAST_US

XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_FAST_US looks to be just an obfuscated version
of the default 2 microsecond fast timeout used by
intel_wait_for_register(). Get rid of it to make it clear what's going
on here.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Replace XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_US with XELPDP_PORT_POWERD...
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:43 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Replace XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_US with XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_MS

There was a completely unjustified change to the cx0 powerdown
timeout, and the way it was done now prevents future conversion
to poll_timeout_us().

Assuming there was some reason the bigger timeout let's nuke
the old short timeout (XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_US)
nd replace it with the bigger timeout
(XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_MS).

For consistency with intel_wait_for_register() we'll stick to the
default 2 usec for the fast timeout.

v2: Go for the longer (ms) timeout in case it actually matters
v3: Note the defaullt 2 usec fast timeout (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/ltphy: Nuke extraneous timeout debugs
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:42 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/ltphy: Nuke extraneous timeout debugs

The actual timeout used isn't particularly interesting, so
don't print it. Makes the code simpler.

The debugs are also using some random capitalizaton rule.
Clean that up a bit while at it.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/cx0: Nuke extraneous timeout debugs
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:20:40 +0000 (17:20 +0200)] 
drm/i915/cx0: Nuke extraneous timeout debugs

The actual timeout used isn't particularly interesting, so
don't print it. Makes the code simpler.

The debugs are also using some random capitalizaton rule.
Clean that up a bit while at it.

Also intel_cx0_powerdown_change_sequence() used one timeout
in the actual code but printed a different one.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/gem: s/i915_gem_object_get_frontbuffer/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer_lookup/
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:08 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/gem: s/i915_gem_object_get_frontbuffer/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer_lookup/

The i915_gem_object_get_frontbuffer() name is rather confusing wrt.
intel_frontbuffer_get(). Rename to i915_gem_object_frontbuffer_lookup()
to make things less confusing.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Fix intel_frontbuffer lifetime handling
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:07 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Fix intel_frontbuffer lifetime handling

The current attempted split between xe/i915 vs. display
for intel_frontbuffer is a mess:
- the i915 rcu leaks through the interface to the display side
- the obj->frontbuffer write-side is now protected by a display
  specific spinlock even though the actual obj->framebuffer
  pointer lives in a i915 specific structure
- the kref is getting poked directly from both sides
- i915_active is still on the display side

Clean up the mess by moving everything about the frontbuffer
lifetime management to the i915/xe side:
- the rcu usage is now completely contained in i915
- frontbuffer_lock is moved into i915
- kref is on the i915/xe side (xe needs the refcount as well
  due to intel_frontbuffer_queue_flush()->intel_frontbuffer_ref())
- the bo (and its refcounting) is no longer on the display side
- i915_active is contained in i915

I was pondering whether we could do this in some kind of smaller
steps, and perhaps we could, but it would probably have to start
with a bunch of reverts (which for sure won't go cleanly anymore).
So not convinced it's worth the hassle.

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Add intel_frontbuffer::display
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:06 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Add intel_frontbuffer::display

After upcoming intel_frontbuffer lifetime related changes we
won't need intel_frontbuffer::obj for anything apart from
getting at the display. Add a direct pointer for that instead
so that the obj pointer can be completely eliminated.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Extract intel_frontbuffer_ref()
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:05 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Extract intel_frontbuffer_ref()

I want to hide the kref from the high level frontbuffer code.
To that end abstract the kref_get() in intel_frontbuffer_queue_flush()
(which is the only high level function that needs this) as a new
intel_frontbuffer_ref().

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Split fb_tracking.lock into two
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:04 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Split fb_tracking.lock into two

Our fb_tracking.lock is serving a double duty:
- protects fb_tracking.busy_bits
- provides the write-side protection for obj->frontbuffer

Split obj->frontbuffer role into a separate lock so that
we can clean up the current mess with the frontbuffer lifetime
management.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Handle the dirtyfb cache flush inside intel_frontbuffer_flush()
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:03 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Handle the dirtyfb cache flush inside intel_frontbuffer_flush()

intel_bo_frontbuffer_flush_for_display() is a bit too low level
to be directly in the high level dirtyfb code. Move the calls
into intel_frontbuffer_flush().

There is a slight behavioural change here in that we now skip
the flush if the bo is not a current scanout buffer (front->bits
== 0). But that is fine as the flush will eventually happen via
the fb pinning code if/when the bo becomes a scanout buffer again.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Turn intel_bo_flush_if_display() into a frontbuffer operation
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:02 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Turn intel_bo_flush_if_display() into a frontbuffer operation

Convert intel_bo_flush_if_display() to be an operation on the
frontbuffer object rather than the underlying gem bo. This
will help with cleaning up the frontbuffer xe/i915 vs. display
split.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/frontbuffer: Nuke intel_frontbuffer_flip_{prepare,complete}()
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:01 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/frontbuffer: Nuke intel_frontbuffer_flip_{prepare,complete}()

Get rid of intel_frontbuffer_flip_{prepare,complete}() (and
the accompanying flip_bits) since they are unused.

I suppose these could technically provide a minor optimization
over intel_frontbuffer_flip() in that the flush would get
deferred further if new rendering were to sneak in between the
prepare() and complete() calls. But for correctness it should
not make any difference since another flush will anyway follow
once the new rendering finishes.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/overlay: Switch to intel_frontbuffer_flip()
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:54:00 +0000 (21:54 +0300)] 
drm/i915/overlay: Switch to intel_frontbuffer_flip()

Get rid of intel_frontbuffer_flip_{prepare,complete}() from
the overlay code and just use intel_frontbuffer_flip() instead.

The only difference between these are the light interactions
with the ORIGIN_CS busyness tracking, but since the only user
of this is the overlay/xf86-video-intel/Xv the buffer will
always be filled by the CPU and thus we'll never see any
ORIGIN_CS frontbuffer activity there anyway. Also I don't
think we actually have anything covered by the frontbuffer
tracking that affects the overlay (FBC is on the primary
plane, DRRS isn't currently enabled on the platforms with
overlay, and PSR doesn't exist in the hardware).

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/overlay: Drop the DIRTYFB flush
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:53:59 +0000 (21:53 +0300)] 
drm/i915/overlay: Drop the DIRTYFB flush

I don't even know why we have this DIRTYFB flush in the overlay
code. We'll anyway call intel_frontbuffer_flip() so there should
be no need to pretend that this is some kind of frontbuffer only
rendering operation.

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/psr: fix pipe to vblank conversion
Jani Nikula [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 20:00:00 +0000 (22:00 +0200)] 
drm/i915/psr: fix pipe to vblank conversion

First, we can't assume pipe == crtc index. If a pipe is fused off in
between, it no longer holds. intel_crtc_for_pipe() is the only proper
way to get from a pipe to the corresponding crtc.

Second, drivers aren't supposed to access or index drm->vblank[]
directly. There's drm_crtc_vblank_crtc() for this.

Use both functions to fix the pipe to vblank conversion.

Fixes: f02658c46cf7 ("drm/i915/psr: Add mechanism to notify PSR of pipe enable/disable")
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.16+
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106200000.1455164-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
3 months agoMerge tag 'drm-misc-next-2025-11-05-1' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc...
Dave Airlie [Fri, 7 Nov 2025 02:40:51 +0000 (12:40 +1000)] 
Merge tag 'drm-misc-next-2025-11-05-1' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel into drm-next

drm-misc-next for v6.19-rc1:

UAPI Changes:
- Add userptr support to ivpu.
- Add IOCTL's for resource and telemetry data in amdxdna.

Core Changes:
- Improve some atomic state checking handling.
- drm/client updates.
- Use forward declarations instead of including drm_print.h
- RUse allocation flags in ttm_pool/device_init and allow specifying max
  useful pool size and propagate ENOSPC.
- Updates and fixes to scheduler and bridge code.
- Add support for quirking DisplayID checksum errors.

Driver Changes:
- Assorted cleanups and fixes in rcar-du, accel/ivpu, panel/nv3052cf,
  sti, imxm, accel/qaic, accel/amdxdna, imagination, tidss, sti,
  panthor, vkms.
- Add Samsung S6E3FC2X01 DDIC/AMS641RW, Synaptics TDDI series DSI,
  TL121BVMS07-00 (IL79900A) panels.
- Add mali MediaTek MT8196 SoC gpu support.
- Add etnaviv GC8000 Nano Ultra VIP r6205 support.
- Document powervr ge7800 support in the devicetree.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5afae707-c9aa-4a47-b726-5e1f1aa7a106@linux.intel.com
3 months agoMerge tag 'drm-intel-next-2025-11-04' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915...
Dave Airlie [Thu, 6 Nov 2025 23:45:38 +0000 (09:45 +1000)] 
Merge tag 'drm-intel-next-2025-11-04' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel into drm-next

drm/i915 feature pull for v6.19:

Features and functionality:
- Enable LNL+ content adaptive sharpness filter (CASF) (Nemesa)
- Use optimized VRR guardband (Ankit, Ville)
- Enable Xe3p LT PHY (Suraj)
- Enable FBC support for Xe3p_LPD display (Sai Teja, Vinod)
- Specify DMC firmware for display version 30.02 (Dnyaneshwar)
- Report reason for disabling PSR to debugfs (Michał)
- Extend i915_display_info with Type-C port details (Khaled)
- Log DSI send packet sequence errors and contents

Refactoring and cleanups:
- Refactoring to prepare for VRR guardband optimization (Ankit)
- Abstract VRR live status wait (Ankit)
- Refactor VRR and DSB timing to handle Set Context Latency explicitly (Ankit)
- Helpers for prefill latency calculations (Ville)
- Refactor SKL+ watermark latency setup (Ville)
- VRR refactoring and cleanups (Ville)
- SKL+ universal plane cleanups (Ville)
- Decouple CDCLK from state->modeset refactor (Ville)
- Refactor VLV/CHV clock functions (Jani)
- Refactor fbdev handling (Jani)
- Call i915 and xe runtime PM from display via function pointers (Jouni)
- IRQ code refactoring  (Jani)
- Drop display dependency on i915 feature check macros (Jani)
- Refactor and unify i915 and xe stolen memory interfaces towards display (Jani)
- Switch to driver agnostic drm to display pointer chase (Jani)
- Use display version over graphics version in display code (Matt A)
- GVT cleanups (Jonathan, Andi)
- Rename a VLV clock function to unify (Michał)
- Explicitly sanitize DMC package header num entries (Luca)
- Remove redundant port clock check from ALPM (Jouni)
- Use sysfs_emit() instead of sprintf() in PMU sysfs (Madhur Kumar)
- Clean up C20 PHY PLL register macros (Imre, Mika))
- Abstract "address in MMIO table" helper for general use (Matt A)
- Improve VRR platform abstractions (Ville)
- Move towards more standard PCI PM code usage (Ville)
- Framebuffer refactoring (Ville)
- Drop display dependency on i915_utils.h (Jani)
- Include cleanups (Jani)

Fixes:
- Workaround docking station DSC issues with high pixel clock and bpp (Imre)
- Fix Panel Replay in DSC mode (Imre)
- Disable tracepoints for PREEMPT_RT as a workaround (Maarten)
- Fix intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter() on PREEMPT_RT (Maarten)
- Fix C10 PHY identification on PTL/WCL (Dnyaneshwar)
- Take AS SDP into account with optimized guardband (Jouni)
- Fix panic structure allocation memory leak (Jani)
- Adjust an FBC workaround platforms (Vinod)
- Add fallback for CDCLK selection (Naladala)
- Avoid using invalid transcoder in MST transport select (Suraj)
- Don't use cursor size reduction on display version 14+ (Nemesa)
- Fix C20 PHY PLL register programming (Imre, Mika)
- Fix PSR frontbuffer flush handling (Jouni)
- Store ALPM parameters in crtc state (Jouni)
- Defeature DRRS on LNL+ (Ville)
- Fix the scope of the large DRAM DIMM workaround (Ville)
- Fix PICA vs. AUX power ordering issue (Gustavo)
- Fix pixel rate for computing watermark line time (Ville)
- Fix framebuffer set_tiling vs. addfb race (Ville)
- DMC event handler fixes (Ville)

DRM Core:
- CRTC sharpness strength property (Nemesa)
- DPCD DSC quirk for Synaptics Panamera devices (Imre)
- Helpers to query the branch DSC max throughput/line-width (Imre)

Merges:
- Backmerge drm-next for v6.18-rc and to sync with drm-xe-next (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ec5a05f2df6d597a62033ee2d57225cce707b320@intel.com
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Adapt to updates on MBUS_CTL/DBUF_CTL registers
Ravi Kumar Vodapalli [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:06 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Adapt to updates on MBUS_CTL/DBUF_CTL registers

Xe3p_LPD updated fields of registers MBUS_CTL and DBUF_CTL to
accommodate for higher MDCLK:CDCLK ratios.  Update the code to use the
new fields.

The field MBUS_TRANSLATION_THROTTLE_MIN_MASK was changed from range
[15:13] to [16:13].  Since bit 16 is not reserved in previous display
IPs and already used for something else, we can't simply extend the mask
definition to include it, but rather define an Xe3p-specific mask and
select the correct one to use based on the IP version.

Similarly, DBUF_MIN_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE_MASK was changed from range
[18:16] to [20:16]. For the same reasons stated above, it needs a
Xe3p-specific mask definition.

v2:
  - Keep definitions in the same line (i.e. without line continuation
    breaks) for better readability. (Jani)
v3:
  - Keep mask fields sorted by the upper limit. (Matt)
  - Extend commit message to indicate why we need Xe3p-specific
    definitions of the masks instead of just extending the existing
    ones. (Matt)

Bspec: 68868, 68872
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-18-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Always apply WaWmMemoryReadLatency
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:05 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Always apply WaWmMemoryReadLatency

When reading memory latencies for watermark calculations, previous
display releases instructed to apply an adjustment of adding a certain
value (e.g. 6us) to all levels when the level 0's memory latency read
from hardware was zero.

For Xe3p_LPD, the instruction is to always use 6us for level 0 and to
add that value to the other levels.  Add the necessary code in
sanitize_wm_latency() so that WaWmMemoryReadLatency is always applied
for Xe3p_LPD and beyond.

v2:
  - Rebased after addition of prep patch "drm/i915/wm: Reorder
    adjust_wm_latency() for Xe3_LPD" (dropped in v3).
v3:
  - Back to the simpler approach of doing the 'wm[0] = 0' step without
    modifying the rest of the code, and that inside
    sanitize_wm_latency(). (Matt Roper, Ville)

Bspec: 68986, 69126
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-20-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/dram: Add field ecc_impacting_de_bw
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:04 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/dram: Add field ecc_impacting_de_bw

Starting with Xe3p_LPD, we now have a new field in MEM_SS_INFO_GLOBAL
that indicates whether the memory has enabled ECC that limits display
bandwidth.  Add the field ecc_impacting_de_bw to struct dram_info to
contain that information and set it appropriately when probing for
memory info.

Currently there are no instructions in Bspec on how to handle that case,
so let's throw a warning if we ever find such a scenario.

v2:
  - s/ecc_impacting_de/ecc_impacting_de_bw/ to be more specific. (Matt
    Atwood)
  - Add warning if ecc_impacting_de_bw is true, since we currently do
    not have instructions on how to handle it. (Matt Roper)
v3:
  - Check on ecc_impacting_de_bw for the warning only for Xe3p_LPD and
    beyond.
  - Change warning macro from drm_WARN_ON_ONCE() to drm_WARN_ON().

Bspec: 69131
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-15-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/wm: don't use method1 in Xe3p_LPD onwards
Luca Coelho [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:03 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/wm: don't use method1 in Xe3p_LPD onwards

Starting from display version 35, we don't need to use method1 to
calculate the watermark values anymore, so skip it.

Bspec: 68985
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-14-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Reload DMC MMIO for pipes C and D
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:02 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Reload DMC MMIO for pipes C and D

Xe3p_LPD has the same behavior as for Xe3_LPD with respect to DMC
context data for pipes C and D, which are lost when their power wells
are disabled.  As such, let's extend the condition for Xe3_LPD in
need_pipedmc_load_mmio() to also catch Xe3p_LPD.

Bspec: 68851
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-13-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Don't allow odd ypan or ysize with semiplanar format
Juha-pekka Heikkila [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:01 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Don't allow odd ypan or ysize with semiplanar format

Disable support for odd panning and size in y direction when running on
display version 35 and using semiplanar formats.

Bspec: 68903
Signed-off-by: Juha-pekka Heikkila <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-12-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Extend Wa_16025573575
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:00 +0000 (11:07 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Extend Wa_16025573575

Wa_16025573575 also applies to Xe3p_LPD, so let's include it in the IP
version checks.

Reviewed-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-11-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Drop support for interlace mode
Ankit Nautiyal [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:59 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Drop support for interlace mode

Interlace mode is officially removed from HW from Xe3p_LPD.  The
register TRANS_VSYNCSHIFT and the bits in TRANS_CONF are now removed, so
make sure we do not set/get these anymore.

Bspec: 69961, 70000
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-10-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Load DMC firmware
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:58 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Load DMC firmware

Load the DMC firmware for Xe3p_LPD.

Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-9-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Add CDCLK table
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:57 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Add CDCLK table

Add CDCLK table for Xe3p_LPD.

Just as with Xe3_LPD, we don't need to send voltage index info in the
PMDemand message, so we are able to re-use xe3lpd_cdclk_funcs.

With the new CDCLK table, we also need to update the maximum CDCLK value
returned by intel_update_max_cdclk().

Bspec: 68861, 68863
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-8-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Remove gamma,csc bottom color checks
Sai Teja Pottumuttu [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:56 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Remove gamma,csc bottom color checks

With Xe3p_LPD, the SKL_BOTTOM_COLOR_GAMMA_ENABLE and
SKL_BOTTOM_COLOR_CSC_ENABLE bits are being removed. Thus, we need not
set gamma_enable nor csc_enable in crtc_state.

Note that GAMMA_MODE.POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE and CSC_MODE.ICL_CSC_ENABLE
are the documented alternatives for the bottom color bits being removed.
But as these suggested bits are being checked in state checker as part
of gamma_mode, csc_mode fields and as gamma_enable/csc_enable are not
being used anywhere else functionally post ICL, we need not set these
fields in crtc_state.

Bspec: 69734
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-7-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Horizontal flip support for linear surfaces
Sai Teja Pottumuttu [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:55 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Horizontal flip support for linear surfaces

Starting from Xe3p_LPD, linear surfaces also support horizontal flip.

Bspec: 68904
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-6-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Expand bifield masks dbuf blocks fields
Sai Teja Pottumuttu [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:54 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Expand bifield masks dbuf blocks fields

On Xe3p_LPD, the dbuf blocks fields of different registers are now
documented as 13-bit fields. The dbuf isn't really large enough to need
the 13th bit, but let's go ahead and update the definition now just in
case some new display IP in future ends up needing the larger size. The
extra bit is an unused bit in previous display versions, so we can
safely just extend the existing definition.

Bspec: 69847, 69880, 72053
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-5-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Update bandwidth parameters
Matt Atwood [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:53 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Update bandwidth parameters

Bandwidth parameters for Xe3p_LPD are the same as for Xe3_LPD. Re-use
them.

Since handling for Xe3_LPD version 30.02 is more like a special case,
let's use a "== 3002" check for it inside the ">= 30" branch instead of
adding a new branch for version 35.  That allows us to re-use the ">=
30" branch for Xe3p_LPD.

v2:
  - Do not have a special case for ecc_impacting_de_bw, since there are
    no specific instructions in Bspec for this scenario. (Matt Roper)
v3:
  - Re-use the ">= 30" branch in the if-ladder. (Matt Roper)

Bspec: 68859
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-4-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/display: Use braces for if-ladder in intel_bw_init_hw()
Gustavo Sousa [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:52 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/display: Use braces for if-ladder in intel_bw_init_hw()

Looking at the current if-ladder in intel_bw_init_hw(), we see that
Xe2_HPD contains two entries, differing only for ECC memories.  Let's
improve readability by using braces and allowing adding extra conditions
for each case.

v2:
  - Tweaked commit message, since we are not going to add the ECC case
    for Xe3p_LPD anymore.

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-3-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Drop north display reset option programming
Matt Roper [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:51 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Drop north display reset option programming

The NDE_RSTWRN_OPT has been removed on Xe3p platforms and reset option
programming is no longer necessary during display init.

Bspec: 68846, 69137
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-2-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
3 months agodrm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Add Xe3p_LPD display IP features
Sai Teja Pottumuttu [Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:06:50 +0000 (11:06 -0300)] 
drm/i915/xe3p_lpd: Add Xe3p_LPD display IP features

Xe3p_LPD (display version 35) is similar to Xe2_LPD with respect to the
features described by struct intel_display_device_info, so reuse its
device descriptor.

v2:
  - Add reference to Bspec 74201. (Shekhar)

Bspec: 74201, 74304
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-1-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>