vect: Fix access size alignment assumption [PR115192]
create_intersect_range_checks checks whether two access ranges
a and b are alias-free using something equivalent to:
end_a <= start_b || end_b <= start_a
It has two ways of doing this: a "vanilla" way that calculates
the exact exclusive end pointers, and another way that uses the
last inclusive aligned pointers (and changes the comparisons
accordingly). The comment for the latter is:
/* Calculate the minimum alignment shared by all four pointers,
then arrange for this alignment to be subtracted from the
exclusive maximum values to get inclusive maximum values.
This "- min_align" is cumulative with a "+ access_size"
in the calculation of the maximum values. In the best
(and common) case, the two cancel each other out, leaving
us with an inclusive bound based only on seg_len. In the
worst case we're simply adding a smaller number than before.
The problem is that the associated code implicitly assumed that the
access size was a multiple of the pointer alignment, and so the
alignment could be carried over to the exclusive end pointer.
The testcase started failing after g:
9fa5b473b5b8e289b6542
because that commit improved the alignment information for
the accesses.
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/115192
* tree-data-ref.cc (create_intersect_range_checks): Take the
alignment of the access sizes into account.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/115192
* gcc.dg/vect/pr115192.c: New test.