From 00ea72ddac7c6551163a323876b1bb784177c8e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "R. Kelley Cook" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:17:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] CRLF -> CR correction From-SVN: r85246 --- gcc/cp/call.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- gcc/cp/decl.c | 8 ++++---- gcc/cp/init.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.c b/gcc/cp/call.c index 313460b69845..727698a0d106 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/call.c +++ b/gcc/cp/call.c @@ -4328,20 +4328,20 @@ convert_arg_to_ellipsis (arg) arg = require_complete_type (arg); - if (arg != error_mark_node - && !pod_type_p (TREE_TYPE (arg))) - { - /* Undefined behavior [expr.call] 5.2.2/7. We used to just warn - here and do a bitwise copy, but now cp_expr_size will abort if we - try to do that. - If the call appears in the context of a sizeof expression, - there is no need to emit a warning, since the expression won't be - evaluated. We keep the builtin_trap just as a safety check. */ - if (!skip_evaluation) - warning ("cannot pass objects of non-POD type `%#T' through `...'; " - "call will abort at runtime", TREE_TYPE (arg)); - arg = call_builtin_trap (); - } + if (arg != error_mark_node + && !pod_type_p (TREE_TYPE (arg))) + { + /* Undefined behavior [expr.call] 5.2.2/7. We used to just warn + here and do a bitwise copy, but now cp_expr_size will abort if we + try to do that. + If the call appears in the context of a sizeof expression, + there is no need to emit a warning, since the expression won't be + evaluated. We keep the builtin_trap just as a safety check. */ + if (!skip_evaluation) + warning ("cannot pass objects of non-POD type `%#T' through `...'; " + "call will abort at runtime", TREE_TYPE (arg)); + arg = call_builtin_trap (); + } return arg; } diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c index 7cdf89352711..dfdeb1e51712 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c @@ -4940,10 +4940,10 @@ push_overloaded_decl (decl, flags) } if (old || TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL - /* If it's a using declaration, we always need to build an OVERLOAD, - because it's the only way to remember that the declaration comes - from 'using', and have the lookup behave correctly. */ - || (flags & PUSH_USING)) + /* If it's a using declaration, we always need to build an OVERLOAD, + because it's the only way to remember that the declaration comes + from 'using', and have the lookup behave correctly. */ + || (flags & PUSH_USING)) { if (old && TREE_CODE (old) != OVERLOAD) new_binding = ovl_cons (decl, ovl_cons (old, NULL_TREE)); diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c index 5a408030d7d9..f2959b6c808b 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/init.c +++ b/gcc/cp/init.c @@ -3123,8 +3123,8 @@ build_delete (type, addr, auto_delete, flags, use_global_delete) warning ("possible problem detected in invocation of " "delete operator:"); cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic (addr, type, 1); - inform ("neither the destructor nor the class-specific " - "operator delete will be called, even if they are " + inform ("neither the destructor nor the class-specific " + "operator delete will be called, even if they are " "declared when the class is defined."); complete_p = false; } -- 2.47.2