From 0abb38e5874b51c6e33cdfe428021ea82425a3f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 20:24:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] (new_item, record_relation): Use `sizeof *var' rather than
 `sizeof EXPLICIT_TYPE'. The former is more maintainable and usually shorter.

---
 src/tsort.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/tsort.c b/src/tsort.c
index c6b7855a45..3cae86d206 100644
--- a/src/tsort.c
+++ b/src/tsort.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ With no FILE, or when FILE is -, read standard input.\n\
 static struct item *
 new_item (const char *str)
 {
-  struct item *k = xmalloc (sizeof (struct item));
+  struct item *k = xmalloc (sizeof *k);
 
   k->str = (str ? xstrdup (str): NULL);
   k->left = k->right = NULL;
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ record_relation (struct item *j, struct item *k)
   if (!STREQ (j->str, k->str))
     {
       k->count++;
-      p = xmalloc (sizeof (struct successor));
+      p = xmalloc (sizeof *p);
       p->suc = k;
       p->next = j->top;
       j->top = p;
-- 
2.47.2