From 0d79d8a324f161dae2a19b3b497506a3e009b12d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:30:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Don't use -Wdeclaration-after-statement.  We long since
 abandoned any pretense of being buildable with gcc prior to 3.0, hence
 there's no point in having this flag.

git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@10984
---
 configure.in | 27 ---------------------------
 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 11fb3004c1..44353a74e8 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -1217,33 +1217,6 @@ if test x$no_pointer_sign = xyes; then
 fi
 
 
-# does this compiler support -Wdeclaration-after-statement ?
-AC_MSG_CHECKING([if gcc accepts -Wdeclaration-after-statement])
-
-safe_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS
-CFLAGS="-Wdeclaration-after-statement"
-
-AC_TRY_COMPILE(, [
-  return 0;
-],
-[
-declaration_after_statement=yes
-FLAG_WDECL_AFTER_STMT="-Wdeclaration-after-statement"
-AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
-], [
-declaration_after_statement=no
-FLAG_WDECL_AFTER_STMT=""
-AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
-])
-CFLAGS=$safe_CFLAGS
-
-AC_SUBST(FLAG_WDECL_AFTER_STMT)
-
-if test x$declaration_after_statement = xyes; then
-  CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wdeclaration-after-statement"
-fi
-
-
 # does this compiler support -Wno-empty-body ?
 
 AC_MSG_CHECKING([if gcc accepts -Wno-empty-body])
-- 
2.47.2