From 2269aeb76c0531fe09e1dbb0d66fa3961159247c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Floyd Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:16:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Dnother iteration for getting the right expected line numbers. --- drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc | 4 ++-- memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.exp | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc b/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc index 9a42458da9..72cbe743c1 100644 --- a/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc +++ b/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex. by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:44) + at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52) mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex. by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:44) + at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53) mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) diff --git a/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.exp b/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.exp index 78e416bdcd..6846e3a58e 100644 --- a/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.exp +++ b/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.exp @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line ... - by 0x........: main (badjump2.c:47) + by 0x........: main (badjump2.c:48) Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd Signal caught, as expected -- 2.47.2