From 265be51fa768ba7c4c993c1a92562b73ee6d9b49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Leggett Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:57:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update proposal. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x@1824484 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 1bd8295d197..6d13a6e246a 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -129,10 +129,11 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: jailletc36: is message 010118 still needed? Or at least mitigated with something like: "for third party proxy module usage only"? Also, does it require a ap_mmn.h update? - minfrin: message 010118 toned down, MMN bump updated, clash with r1823482 resolved - http://svn.apache.org/r1824460 - 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/proxy-rfc1035-hostname-v2.diff ylavic: +1 with s/APLOG_NOTICE/APLOG_INFO/... + minfrin: message 010118 toned down, MMN bump updated, clash with r1823482 resolved, s/APLOG_NOTICE/APLOG_INFO/ + http://svn.apache.org/r1824460 + http://svn.apache.org/r1824482 + 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/proxy-rfc1035-hostname-v3.diff *) mpm_queue: Put fdqueue code in common for MPMs event and worker. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1821624 -- 2.47.2