From 41413db0a4b81808f11e6e0451e20e6337f5c630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Dupont <fdupont@isc.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 11:14:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [4283] Fixed a bug revealed by last change

---
 src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/rate_control_unittest.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/rate_control_unittest.cc b/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/rate_control_unittest.cc
index d2824a2729..cf2e0f6e30 100644
--- a/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/rate_control_unittest.cc
+++ b/src/bin/perfdhcp/tests/rate_control_unittest.cc
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ TEST(RateControl, getOutboundMessageCount) {
     // when the calcuation is made may be different from the interval set.)  The
     // margin in this test is reasonably generous, allowing for a timing error
     // of around 10ms.
-    uint64_t count;
+    uint64_t count = 0;
     ASSERT_NO_THROW(count = rc1.getOutboundMessageCount());
     EXPECT_TRUE((count >= 5240) && (count <= 5260)) <<
         "count is " << count << ", expected range 5240-5260";
-- 
2.47.2