From 4dbcda1ccaf8a8590579fc7f1912c23101745e5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Watanabe Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:21:38 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] network/ndisc: fix typo Follow-up for e42a74803a5a9a8acf0d630dd775736610af4600. --- src/network/networkd-ndisc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/network/networkd-ndisc.c b/src/network/networkd-ndisc.c index 5d1c895f0d8..7e74712680f 100644 --- a/src/network/networkd-ndisc.c +++ b/src/network/networkd-ndisc.c @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static int ndisc_address_set_lifetime(Address *address, Link *link, sd_ndisc_rou assert(rt); /* This is mostly based on RFC 4862 section 5.5.3 (e). However, the definition of 'RemainingLifetime' - * is ambigous, and there is no clear explanation when the address is not assigned yet. If we assume + * is ambiguous, and there is no clear explanation when the address is not assigned yet. If we assume * that 'RemainingLifetime' is zero in that case, then IPv6 Core Conformance test [v6LC.3.2.5 Part C] * fails. So, in such case, we skip the conditions about 'RemainingLifetime'. */ -- 2.47.3