From 600559b9817f6eaa927035eebb12534fadb35ee8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Atharv Dubey Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 22:26:01 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] rust: rbtree: fix minor typo in comment Fix a typo in a comment to improve clarity and readability. Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1206 Signed-off-by: Atharv Dubey Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251201165601.31484-1-atharvd440@gmail.com [ Removed one of the cases that is gone now. Reworded accordingly (and to avoid mentioning 'documentation', since it is just a comment). - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda --- rust/kernel/rbtree.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs index 4729eb56827a..6c3dbb2e6f0d 100644 --- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs +++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ pub struct IterMut<'a, K, V> { } // SAFETY: The [`IterMut`] has exclusive access to both `K` and `V`, so it is sufficient to require them to be `Send`. -// The iterator only gives out immutable references to the keys, but since the iterator has excusive access to those same +// The iterator only gives out immutable references to the keys, but since the iterator has exclusive access to those same // keys, `Send` is sufficient. `Sync` would be okay, but it is more restrictive to the user. unsafe impl<'a, K: Send, V: Send> Send for IterMut<'a, K, V> {} -- 2.47.3