From 602eb95d6a0ee17bf7563c4b0eb3cf3bc584047b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Jagielski Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:52:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] I'm tending to think we should *not* change this for 1.3.29. I foresee problems when even though the patch corrects behavior, the (previous) incorrect behavior might be used and expected in various ways throughout the community. And I don't want to pull the rug out from under them. Instead, let's see about folding this is for 1.3.30 after some extensive testing. PR: Obtained from: Submitted by: Reviewed by: git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@101495 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index ab9f8b01fc9..7e936d193ba 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- - Last modified at [$Date: 2003/10/19 18:00:34 $] + Last modified at [$Date: 2003/10/20 19:52:50 $] Release: @@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ Release: RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: +RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + * isn't ap_die() broken with recognizing recursive errors Message-Id: <3F8C56E3.8050501@attglobal.net> +1: jeff, jim -RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: - * Current vote on 3 PRs for inclusion: Bugz #17877 (passing chunked encoding thru proxy) (still checking if RFC compliant... vote is on the -- 2.47.2