From 636d7b95c229a9bebd8aaf433efa2bfdb14df1ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:14:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tcp: Annotate data-race around sk->sk_mark in tcp_v4_send_reset [ Upstream commit 80fb40baba19e25a1b6f3ecff6fc5c0171806bde ] This is a follow-up to 3c5b4d69c358 ("net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark"). sk->sk_mark can be read and written without holding the socket lock. IPv6 equivalent is already covered with READ_ONCE() annotation in tcp_v6_send_response(). Fixes: 3c5b4d69c358 ("net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f459d1fc44f205e13f6d8bdca2c8bfb9902ffac9.1736244569.git.daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c index 984435cb1013c..805b1a9eca1c5 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net); if (sk) { ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ? - inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : sk->sk_mark; + inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : READ_ONCE(sk->sk_mark); ctl_sk->sk_priority = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ? inet_twsk(sk)->tw_priority : sk->sk_priority; transmit_time = tcp_transmit_time(sk); -- 2.47.3