From 6830bc40bb6a38dee917bebc856c7c1ba5126e24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:58:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] About To-Do list. --- TODO | 26 ++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 318da823a..9eb7b6ca6 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ ToDo list for elfutils -*-outline-*- ---------------------- -Time-stamp: <2005-08-03 20:38:01 drepper> +Time-stamp: <2005-08-29 08:58:24 drepper> * mkinstalldirs @@ -23,15 +23,7 @@ Time-stamp: <2005-08-03 20:38:01 drepper> remains maintainable. -* libdwarf - -** Should we do more error checking? - - Most functions don't check whether they get a NULL value passed for - a pointer argument. It could be argued that this is OK since it's - a bug inthe program. But perhaps one could catch the case and return - an error which would allow the program using libdwarf to have fewer - places with error checking. +* libdw ** More memory access checks needed @@ -45,12 +37,6 @@ Time-stamp: <2005-08-03 20:38:01 drepper> ** Rename dwarf_getabbrev -** dwarf_loclist() - - This function and its interface seem to be misdesigned. The specification - is unclear and its changed between v2 and v2.1. Other implementation - implement even different behavior. - * nm: @@ -116,6 +102,14 @@ Time-stamp: <2005-08-03 20:38:01 drepper> prelink generated files +* elfcmp + +** treat relocation sections special + + Differences in the relocation sections can be ignored if all + the same symbols with the same targets are present and the order + of overlapping relocations doesn't change. There really never + should be overlapping relocations but who knows. * mcs -- 2.47.2