From 6d029d85aa2b7fa22cd2742a3f9a7f3c8bbdd5da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:25:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Fix check for setting new VLs in sve-ptrace [ Upstream commit 867446f090589626497638f70b10be5e61a0b925 ] The check that the new vector length we set was the expected one was typoed to an assignment statement which for some reason the compilers didn't spot, most likely due to the macros involved. Fixes: a1d7111257cd ("selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface") Acked-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Dev Jain Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250609-kselftest-arm64-ssve-fixups-v2-1-998fcfa6f240@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c index 6d61992fe8a01..c6228176dd1a0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void ptrace_set_get_vl(pid_t child, const struct vec_type *type, return; } - ksft_test_result(new_sve->vl = prctl_vl, "Set %s VL %u\n", + ksft_test_result(new_sve->vl == prctl_vl, "Set %s VL %u\n", type->name, vl); free(new_sve); -- 2.47.3